Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Hard_Configurator Tools
Simple Windows Hardening
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 989855" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p><strong><span style="font-size: 18px">SWH vs. Yellow Cockatoo (SolarMarker)</span></strong></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://redcanary.com/threat-detection-report/threats/yellow-cockatoo/[/URL]</p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/solarmarker-malware/[/URL]</p><p></p><p>In one of my previous posts, I mentioned that EXE/MSI threats are beyond the scope of SWH - such threats are not fileless malware. But in the case of the recent Yellow Cockatoo attacks, the situation is more complex. It uses EXE/MSI file to execute a benign application (PDF Merge) and malicious Powershell script. <strong><span style="color: rgb(0, 168, 133)">SWH blocks PowerShell scripts by default so the attack can be blocked. </span></strong>A similar attack was analyzed in the SWH thread here:</p><p>[URL unfurl="false"]https://malwaretips.com/threads/simple-windows-hardening.102265/post-973934[/URL]</p><p></p><p>On the contrary, the older less advanced Yellow Cockatoo (SolarMarker) attacks did not use fileless methods, so they were beyond the scope of SWH.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 989855, member: 32260"] [B][SIZE=5]SWH vs. Yellow Cockatoo (SolarMarker)[/SIZE][/B] [URL unfurl="true"]https://redcanary.com/threat-detection-report/threats/yellow-cockatoo/[/URL] [URL unfurl="true"]https://unit42.paloaltonetworks.com/solarmarker-malware/[/URL] In one of my previous posts, I mentioned that EXE/MSI threats are beyond the scope of SWH - such threats are not fileless malware. But in the case of the recent Yellow Cockatoo attacks, the situation is more complex. It uses EXE/MSI file to execute a benign application (PDF Merge) and malicious Powershell script. [B][COLOR=rgb(0, 168, 133)]SWH blocks PowerShell scripts by default so the attack can be blocked. [/COLOR][/B]A similar attack was analyzed in the SWH thread here: [URL unfurl="false"]https://malwaretips.com/threads/simple-windows-hardening.102265/post-973934[/URL] On the contrary, the older less advanced Yellow Cockatoo (SolarMarker) attacks did not use fileless methods, so they were beyond the scope of SWH. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top