SpaceX Delivers “Secret” Satellite… Or Not?

  • This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more.

Rengar

Level 16
Jan 6, 2017
788
4,912
Operating System
Windows 8.1
Installed Antivirus
ESET
#1
Launch leaves conspiracy theorists and tech watchers scratching their heads.
Elon Musk’s privatized space flight program is up and running, and has a full launch schedule to show for it. But this latest launch which carried a top-secret satellite payload for the US government has conspiracy theorists and tech watchers alike scratching their heads.

The Zuma mission, originally slated for last fall, supposedly carried a hush-hush spy satellite. Per its policy when launching government projects, SpaceX only live streamed the launch to a certain point, namely, the first stage separation. Frame-worthy photos of the launch appeared on the company’s official social media channels along with the stream up to its point, then cut off for the second stage separation.

Sometime after the end of the video, the satellite was gone. Numerous mainstream media reports have stated it fell back to Earth and either burned up or landed in the ocean. However, SpaceX has issued a veiled but contradictory statement, namely saying that everything it was contracted to do took place without error.


SpaceX statement says everything it was contracted to do took place without error…



All fine with Falcon 9?
Further, there are no cancellations in SpaceX’s upcoming launch schedule, nor any delays. That’s certainly not typical for any space program, especially one that is privately owned but is looking forward to going public and taking on investors in the future. As history has shown, the loss of a single rocket has led to months if not years of delays.

According to George Dvorsky for Gizmodo, “So if this comment by SpaceX is true, that means its Falcon 9 did what it was supposed to do: that is, launch the rocket, perform the two-stage separation, and deploy the Zuma satellite into its intended orbit. And indeed… the incident has not prompted any launch delays or a review of the company’s launch systems.”

Tracking
That’s not all. Another report explains that satellites are tracked by U.S. Strategic Command’s Joint Space Operations Center, basically to keep the 4,000+ active and inactive orbiting satellites from smacking into each other. While Zuma is top secret and therefore does not display the information on its path or location, Strategic Command did increase the number of entries for satellites upon its launch.

SpaceX launched the satellite and its reusable first stage has been recovered, and an entry number for that payload has been initiated for the new undisclosed satellite. That is all that’s being shared, other than the statement that the satellite failed to deploy and is taking on seawater at this very moment.

What gives?
The confusion surrounding the Zuma mission payload is certainly worthy of a sci-fi thriller, but it begs the question as to why so many contradictions for an already-highly classified satellite.
 
Jul 1, 2017
567
1,800
Operating System
Windows 10
Installed Antivirus
Emsisoft
#3
Very hush hush stuff, but this link seems to explain it a bit more...
What Happened to Zuma? What We Know About Secret SpaceX Mission
The way I read it is that the entire mission had two components. The first component was run by SpaceX which was to deliver the satellite into space. The second component was Northrop being responsible for the 2nd stage and getting the satellite to where it needed to go. SpaceX did their part so they said it was a success. Northrop failed at doing their part and the satellite fell back into the atmosphere so they said it failed.

But, because both sides are trying to play the blame game, it comes across as ambigious which doesn't help this classified mission. Who knows. Maybe the entire thing succeeded and it was their job to say it failed to make people think that the satellite isn't up and running.... The only people who will know for sure are a few in the NRO/DoD and a few Congresspeople who want to know wth happened to those tax funds.
 
Aug 31, 2014
560
6,634
#4
The way I read it is that the entire mission had two components. The first component was run by SpaceX which was to deliver the satellite into space. The second component was Northrop being responsible for the 2nd stage and getting the satellite to where it needed to go. SpaceX did their part so they said it was a success. Northrop failed at doing their part and the satellite fell back into the atmosphere so they said it failed.

But, because both sides are trying to play the blame game, it comes across as ambigious which doesn't help this classified mission. Who knows. Maybe the entire thing succeeded and it was their job to say it failed to make people think that the satellite isn't up and running.... The only people who will know for sure are a few in the NRO/DoD and a few Congresspeople who want to know wth happened to those tax funds.
Insurance job? lol
 
Apr 1, 2015
252
772
Operating System
Windows 10
Installed Antivirus
Kaspersky
#5
Ah, the US media.....

So much noise, never use it to invest otherwise you'll go crazy...
 
Likes: Rengar