SpywareBlaster Review (2016)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted Member 333v73x
  • Start date Start date

What do YOU think of SpywareBlaster

  • 5 - Outstanding

    Votes: 4 30.8%
  • 4 - Very Good

    Votes: 2 15.4%
  • 3 - Good

    Votes: 2 15.4%
  • 2 - Average

    Votes: 4 30.8%
  • 1 - Bad

    Votes: 1 7.7%

  • Total voters
    13
  • Poll closed .
Product name
Brightford SpywareBlaster
Pros
  • - Uses immunization features
    - Full compatibility with other software
    - Blocks tracking cookies
    - Hardenes browser settings
    - Blocks some malicious sites
    - Freeware
CONS
- Requires manual updating unless you are willing to pay
BOTTOM LINE
The good outlays the bad here by far, very good program.
I noticed this program in your config, and it sounds familiar, but I don't think I ever used it. Am I right in saying that it's an old school program? Not saying it's bad, but it's not a recent development? I'm going to try it out and let you all know what I think.
 
I noticed this program in your config, and it sounds familiar, but I don't think I ever used it. Am I right in saying that it's an old school program? Not saying it's bad, but it's not a recent development? I'm going to try it out and let you all know what I think.
It has been going for a while but has database updates often and has full support.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CySecy825
It appears you're right, but I'm in the program and I don't see any protection options for
Chrome.

Edit: by no variations, you mean this wouldn't work with Slimjet?
 

Attachments

  • Capture.PNG
    Capture.PNG
    99.7 KB · Views: 717
It appears you're right, but I'm in the program and I don't see any protection options for Chrome.
Do you have Chrome installed?

P.S: Update and 'Enable All Protection'.
 
I have Flashpeak Slimjet. See my edit. I think it's because I don't use Chrome native.
Yes, it ONLY supports - Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome and Internet Explorer (P.S: Although it may not protect your default browser it is still woth using).
 
That's okay. I'll boot up Chrome native and I'll edit this post with how it goes.

Edit: zero decrease in browser performance. I'd say it serves its purpose, but I will continue to test it over the next few weeks and see if it's worth keeping. For now, I give it 4 stars.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Honestly Spywareblaster tool is a least priority for a user since many programs nowadays have better and accurate blocking hence its mainstream tends to use always.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Noxx
True enough. What it has going for it is it's light as a feather, and it's not Spybot Search & Destroy, which I thought had an exceptional immunizer back in the day. Maybe it's still decent, but I'm not going to get it just for that feature alone.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

You may also like...