Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Security Statistics and Reports
Summary of the March edition of tests on virus samples from the Internet
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 986242" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>I am not sure what you mean by my proposition. My proposition is to use only two levels: "pre-execution stage" (L1+L2) and "on(post)-execution stage" (L3). This will be more understandable for readers. From a few threads about AVLab testing, it follows that readers can have serious problems with understanding the meaning of Levels 1,2, and 3. These levels are strictly connected with the testing methodology without a clear connection with the AV proactive features. One could recover some connections by analyzing the logs, detection names, event IDs, etc. but this would be time-consuming and would probably require some help from the AV vendors. The only AV testing lab that tries to do it (in a limited way) is MRG Effitas:</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]266211[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>My proposition is only a loose suggestion. There is nothing wrong with Levels 1,2, and 3, although the current description of these levels can be misguiding for some readers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 986242, member: 32260"] I am not sure what you mean by my proposition. My proposition is to use only two levels: "pre-execution stage" (L1+L2) and "on(post)-execution stage" (L3). This will be more understandable for readers. From a few threads about AVLab testing, it follows that readers can have serious problems with understanding the meaning of Levels 1,2, and 3. These levels are strictly connected with the testing methodology without a clear connection with the AV proactive features. One could recover some connections by analyzing the logs, detection names, event IDs, etc. but this would be time-consuming and would probably require some help from the AV vendors. The only AV testing lab that tries to do it (in a limited way) is MRG Effitas: [ATTACH type="full" alt="1651163427580.png"]266211[/ATTACH] My proposition is only a loose suggestion. There is nothing wrong with Levels 1,2, and 3, although the current description of these levels can be misguiding for some readers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top