Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="itman71" data-source="post: 986712" data-attributes="member: 83966">Thanks for your consideration of my suggestion.To Eset users even if the above was implemented, the comparison between EIS and ESSP in regards to ESSP cloud scanning capability is not as straight forward as it seems. This is because EIS also has an Eset cloud component to it.Referencing the latest A-V Comparatives Malware Protection test: <a href="https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/malware-protection-test-march-2022/" target="_blank">Malware Protection Test March 2022</a> , Eset had identical off-line and on-line detection scores of 96.1%. However, its on-line protection score was 99.7%. This results in a deviation of 3.6%. Assumed is your seeing the result of Eset accessing it&#039;s cloud to get the latest blacklist detection&#039;s and signatures.Therefore, any off-line testing of ESSP in regards to LiveGuard cloud scanning effectiveness must also factor in loss of cloud blacklist detections and latest signatures. A rough approximation would be if ESSP off-line/on-line testing resulted in a protection deviation greater than 3.6%, then one could conclude that difference was due to the ESSP LiveGuard cloud scanning factor.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="itman71, post: 986712, member: 83966"] Thanks for your consideration of my suggestion. To Eset users even if the above was implemented, the comparison between EIS and ESSP in regards to ESSP cloud scanning capability is not as straight forward as it seems. This is because EIS also has an Eset cloud component to it. Referencing the latest A-V Comparatives Malware Protection test: [URL='https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/malware-protection-test-march-2022/']Malware Protection Test March 2022[/URL] , Eset had identical off-line and on-line detection scores of 96.1%. However, its on-line protection score was 99.7%. This results in a deviation of 3.6%. Assumed is your seeing the result of Eset accessing it's cloud to get the latest blacklist detection's and signatures. Therefore, any off-line testing of ESSP in regards to LiveGuard cloud scanning effectiveness must also factor in loss of cloud blacklist detections and latest signatures. A rough approximation would be if ESSP off-line/on-line testing resulted in a protection deviation greater than 3.6%, then one could conclude that difference was due to the ESSP LiveGuard cloud scanning factor. [/QUOTE]

Verification