Summary result for August 2013. AvLab.pl

Petrovic

Level 64
Thread author
Verified
Honorary Member
Top Poster
Well-known
Apr 25, 2013
5,357
20,490
6,278
Somewhere In nowhere
Summary of the results of LabAV for September 2013.
itrnvwgkk2.jpg

vh1r55931o.jpg

n5ejvkvkrn.jpg

unmr3gzvnq.jpg

j9elqxpu34.jpg

Source
 
MalwareVirus said:
FortiClient Free 5 doing a good job

Thanks for share:)
its always good to see that some free software is performing head-to-head with paid softwares.
its a quality software, but they should decrease no. of processes if possible, its 8/9 processes, although those doesn't take much RAM/CPU, yet its little odd when we see Task Manager :(

CIS performed worst in URL test, because they dependent on Comodo DNS, they actually have no URL filter AFAIK, yet fans can use K9 web filter with Comodo, K9 performs good.
http://www1.k9webprotection.com/
.
 
"its always good to see that some free software is performing head-to-head with paid softwares"
I agree
"CIS performed worst in URL test, because they dependent on Comodo DNS, they actually have no URL filter AFAIK"
yes tapoo bhai i agree with you on this too comodo should enhance their web filter or they can made it like dr.web link checker.I am using VTzila but my real protection is sandboxie coz 99% i used sandboxed Firefox.
Thanks for share your info
 
The only threats I see if you've downloaded and plan to run an unknown executable, or running out-date / vulnerable software that can be exploited (ie. Java exploits).

Malicious URLs are noticeable from the Address bar. Most browsers ask (or can be configured) before any files are downloaded. Other browsers have download checks for malicious content, or have warnings.