Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Install the app
Install
Reply to thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Hard_Configurator Tools
Testing Windows Hybrid Hardening (new hardening application).
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 97327" data-source="post: 1056077"><p>When something is dropped without the MOTW it will install without any protection of WDAC, is that correct?</p><p></p><p>Did you know that smartscreen also tells ISG and SAC to allow stuf when Smartscreen considers this safe? So how would ISG or SAC produce more false positives when an executable was installed using smartscreen compared with your smart solution using the same smartscreen approach?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Are you aware that amateur red hackers often used GitHub and Visual Studio binaries to evade the MOTW? Most really nasty malware does not use regular software to evade MOTW detection anyway. Are you sure you are not underestimating the achilles heel holes (by relying on MOTW and excluding dynamic code)?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 97327, post: 1056077"] When something is dropped without the MOTW it will install without any protection of WDAC, is that correct? Did you know that smartscreen also tells ISG and SAC to allow stuf when Smartscreen considers this safe? So how would ISG or SAC produce more false positives when an executable was installed using smartscreen compared with your smart solution using the same smartscreen approach? Are you aware that amateur red hackers often used GitHub and Visual Studio binaries to evade the MOTW? Most really nasty malware does not use regular software to evade MOTW detection anyway. Are you sure you are not underestimating the achilles heel holes (by relying on MOTW and excluding dynamic code)? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top