Serious Discussion Three Unpatched Vulnerabilities Plague Comodo. Documented Online.

Would you use vulnerable and outdated software, when alternatives exist?

  • Yes

  • No

Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
The AI Expert argumentation is valid for highly targeted attacks. The Comodo vendor should patch those vulnerabilities as soon as possible.
Anyway, we discussed on MT some other, more dangerous, and still unpatched flaws. Yet, there are no reports that they were used in the wild. Just as the bypass I discovered last year (via shortcut + WDAC policy), those possible bypasses are also unimportant for home users.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • +Reputation
Reactions: Khushal, simmerskool, piquiteco and 4 others
Andy Ful said:
The AI Expert argumentation is valid for highly targeted attacks. The Comodo vendor should patch those vulnerabilities as soon as possible.
Anyway, we discussed on MT some other, more dangerous, and still unpatched flaws. Yet, there are no reports that they were used in the wild. Just as the bypass I discovered last year (via shortcut + WDAC policy), those possible bypasses are also unimportant for home users.
Click to expand...
The AI's expert argument typically addresses a vulnerability. Challenge the AI with your expert arguments. It will apologize and change its response. Then, provide product-specific expert arguments. The AI will apologize and agree. It will also offer a new response. Continue this process. The AI will eventually give invalid responses that seem valid. Continue challenging it. Finally, the AI will apologize and admit defeat. It will then suggest contacting the vendor for accurate information. 😊
 
Last edited:
  • HaHa
  • Like
  • Hundred Points
Reactions: brambedkar59, Khushal, simmerskool and 7 others
rashmi said:
The AI's expert argument typically addresses a vulnerability. Challenge the AI with your expert arguments. It will apologize and change its response. Then, provide product-specific expert arguments. The AI will apologize and agree. It will also offer a new response. Continue this process. The AI will eventually give invalid responses that seem valid. Continue challenging it. Finally, the AI will apologize and admit defeat. It will then suggest contacting the vendor for accurate information. 😊
Click to expand...

I found AI-based information to be useful when searching for sources. Next, I inspect those sources and compare my conclusions (based on AI sources and other known sources) with AI. Finally, I correct my conclusions if some AI arguments are solid.
 
  • Like
  • +Reputation
  • Applause
Reactions: Khushal, simmerskool, rashmi and 5 others
Andy Ful said:
I found AI-based information to be useful when searching for sources. Next, I inspect those sources and compare my conclusions (based on AI sources and other known sources) with AI. Finally, I correct my conclusions if some AI arguments are solid.
Click to expand...
If one wants to invalidate and diminish arguments to support their product of choice, they can always find a way to do it.
 
  • Like
  • Applause
Reactions: SeriousHoax, Khushal, piquiteco and 3 others
What I find interesting about Comodo is their products remain available and websites working. Heavily out of date, but still available. And with all the controversy company remains silent. Latest news published on their website is from 2022.

Do they have anyone employed at all anymore? Does their HQ still works or it's closed?
 
  • Like
  • +Reputation
Reactions: SeriousHoax, Khushal, simmerskool and 7 others
Marko :) said:
What I find interesting about Comodo is their products remain available and websites working. Heavily out of date, but still available. And with all the controversy company remains silent. Latest news published on their website is from 2022.

Do they have anyone employed at all anymore? Does their HQ still works or it's closed?
Click to expand...
They are now more focused on Xcitium. They could merge the Xcitium and Comodo codebases which was the smartest thing they could’ve done. But no, they maintain 2 different codebases, though the Comodo one… yeah. We all know how it is maintained.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SeriousHoax, Khushal, simmerskool and 5 others
Trident said:
They are now more focused on Xcitium. They could merge the Xcitium and Comodo codebases which was the smartest thing they could’ve done. But no, they maintain 2 different codebases, though the Comodo one… yeah. We all know how it is maintained.
Click to expand...
So in other words Comodo and Xcitium are two different companies, operating from the same location and have the same people working for both. With Xcitium being actively developed while Comodo dies in slow and agonizing death. Yeah... totally nothing suspicious here.

I still can't figure out their end goal here.
 
  • Like
  • +Reputation
Reactions: Khushal, simmerskool, rashmi and 6 others
If they had a conscience to spare, they would've already resigned to the fate of unmaintained security software: discontinue it and advise everyone to use something else. The landscape and market have changed drastically since the heyday of Comodo software.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Hundred Points
Reactions: Khushal, simmerskool, ForgottenSeer 67091 and 2 others
Andy Ful said:
I found AI-based information to be useful when searching for sources. Next, I inspect those sources and compare my conclusions (based on AI sources and other known sources) with AI. Finally, I correct my conclusions if some AI arguments are solid.
Click to expand...
AIs are helpful. However, they also provide inaccurate or fabricated information. General/casual prompts elicit similar responses. In a complex/specific case, you need to provide a specific and detailed prompt. This is required to receive a valid response for that specific case. You must also verify the information's accuracy.
 
  • Like
  • Hundred Points
Reactions: Andy Ful, Khushal, Trident and 2 others
rashmi said:
AIs are helpful. However, they also provide inaccurate or fabricated information. General/casual prompts elicit similar responses. In a complex/specific case, you need to provide a specific and detailed prompt. This is required to receive a valid response for that specific case. You must also verify the information's accuracy.
Click to expand...
I don’t see a single statement in the AI that is “incorrect”. The model was provided with the texts from the article and the “defence” statement. The defence statements were proven to be wrong.

I could write these statements myself (and partially did), I attached the AI texts as a second opinion. Because I know how “defence” will react.
 
  • Like
  • Hundred Points
Reactions: Andy Ful, Khushal, simmerskool and 2 others
Trident said:
I don’t see a single statement in the AI that is “incorrect”. The model was provided with the texts from the article and the “defence” statement. The defence statements were proven to be wrong.

I could write these statements myself (and partially did), I attached the AI texts as a second opinion. Because I know how “defence” will react.
Click to expand...
My comments were not a response to your thread or posts. If I had wanted to reply to you, I would have quoted you.
 
  • Like
  • +Reputation
Reactions: Andy Ful, Khushal and Trident
Status
Not open for further replies.

You may also like...