Battle Trust Port vs G Data

[omidomi]

ok friends i waiting for your idea.

 

[Malware1]

Try both and decide yourself what's better.

 

[Terry Ganzi]

GData

Try both and decide yourself what's better.

Great advice

 

[omidomi]

I use Trust Port

 

[Terry Ganzi]

I use Trust Port

If it protects you well don't change it

 

[yigido]

If it protects you well don't change it

Yes. If you have it do not change it. I used to use Comodo and I cannot change it
There is no difference between these two(with precious word "common sense")

 

[Manzai]

Gdata (@nsm0220 )

 

[MalwareT]

GData of course.

 

[Rahadian Putra]

G Data for me, simply because I like the UI (yeah I know it's subjective)
But again...if you already feel safe with trust port and never got any problems, just stick with it..trust port is also well known and reputable Av, it's pretty good, there is no "Better" I think..it's all depends on what user's need and system compatibility

 

[Edward ST]

No way TrustPort. GData, even if it's heavier than TP, it's better than TrustPort.

 

[King Alpha]

G Data.

 

[malinois165]

TrustPort!

 

[Oxygen]

G Data is pretty amazing, the UI is just so refreshing.

 

[nsm0220]

G Data

Gdata (@nsm0220 )

thanks for the adding me to the vote

 

[Littlebits]

Neither they are both false positive kings. I never recommend any AV with more than one AV engine.
If one AV engine can not protect you then you need to change your downloading and browsing habits.
Also learn how to utilize UAC.

Enjoy!!

 

[Oxygen]

Neither they are both false positive kings. I never recommend any AV with more than one AV engine.
If one AV engine can not protect you then you need to change your downloading and browsing habits.
Also learn how to utilize UAC.

Enjoy!!

I thought the false positive king was bitdefender?

 

[Malware1]

I thought the false positive king was bitdefender?

No, the false positive king is Tiranium.

http://malwaretips.com/threads/tiranium-is-2014-the-false-positive-king.28756/

 

[Littlebits]

I thought the false positive king was bitdefender?

Any AV that uses multiple AV engines is a false positive king, especially the ones that use BitDefender with other engines.

For a single AV engine BitDefender is the worse false positive king.

No need to list them all most members know about which products use multiple AV engines.

Enjoy!!

 

[Oxygen]

No, the false positive king is Tiranium.

http://malwaretips.com/threads/tiranium-is-2014-the-false-positive-king.28756/

 

[nsm0220]

Neither they are both false positive kings. I never recommend any AV with more than one AV engine.
If one AV engine can not protect you then you need to change your downloading and browsing habits.
Also learn how to utilize UAC.

Enjoy!!

did you really had to throw water on this