Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Web Extensions
uBlock Origin/Nano Adblocker - User Tips, Questions and Issues Thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lenny_Fox" data-source="post: 855193" data-attributes="member: 82776"><p>[USER=78686]@SeriousHoax[/USER]</p><p></p><p>I don't think the block-list format makes a lot of difference. I think uBlock interpretate's host file blocklists as very simpe ABP block-lists. So I don't think it matters whether you use host file or ABP format in uBlock. My guess is that there is a performance difference when comparing uBlock with uMatrix in the benefit of uMatrix,.</p><p></p><p>The dynamic blocking engines of uBlock and uMatrix are more or less the same with uMatrix having more granular control, so in performance they should be equal. When you compare the static engine of uBlock with uMatrix the uMatrx versions is much simpler. So uMatrix should use less CPU when chewing on the same blocklists as uBlock.</p><p></p><p>When I look at the Javascript on Github (for as much as I understand, only reading JS code) the JS-code of uBlock related to static filtering is at least 3 times larger than the one from uMatrix. Due to more complex ABP syntax, the data structures to process are also more complex so uMatrix is probably faster than uBlock.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lenny_Fox, post: 855193, member: 82776"] [USER=78686]@SeriousHoax[/USER] I don't think the block-list format makes a lot of difference. I think uBlock interpretate's host file blocklists as very simpe ABP block-lists. So I don't think it matters whether you use host file or ABP format in uBlock. My guess is that there is a performance difference when comparing uBlock with uMatrix in the benefit of uMatrix,. The dynamic blocking engines of uBlock and uMatrix are more or less the same with uMatrix having more granular control, so in performance they should be equal. When you compare the static engine of uBlock with uMatrix the uMatrx versions is much simpler. So uMatrix should use less CPU when chewing on the same blocklists as uBlock. When I look at the Javascript on Github (for as much as I understand, only reading JS code) the JS-code of uBlock related to static filtering is at least 3 times larger than the one from uMatrix. Due to more complex ABP syntax, the data structures to process are also more complex so uMatrix is probably faster than uBlock. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top