Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Web Extensions
uBlock Origin/Nano Adblocker - User Tips, Questions and Issues Thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PotentialUser" data-source="post: 890002" data-attributes="member: 87776"><p>Thank you for the reply! I did as you suggested and expanded the listed domains in the uBO addon for Firefox and here is the result for <strong>apple.com</strong>.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]242875[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>In this case, it seems like some <strong>akamaiedge.net </strong>subdomain is masking <strong><a href="http://www.apple.com" target="_blank">www.apple.com</a></strong> (not vice-versa) since the Apple domain is the one in small font under the canonical domain. The same thing happens with a subdomain of <strong>omtrdc.net</strong> masking some "securemvt" Apple subdomain.</p><p></p><p>So we're still in the same dilemma. Had <strong>apple.com</strong> been the one masking <strong>akamaiedge.net</strong> and <strong>omtrdc.net</strong>, I could see how this would be a CNAME issue. But in this case, the Akamai and OMTRDC.net domains are masking Apple domains, not the other way around.</p><p></p><p>Doesn't that mean they both <u>should be</u> showing up in Chromium-based browsers? Because they're not the ones being masked, they are the ones doing the masking. And while Chromium-based browsers don't have the ability to uncloak masked domains, they are still supposed to list the main domains that load up (which the Akamai and OMTRDC.net domains seem to be).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PotentialUser, post: 890002, member: 87776"] Thank you for the reply! I did as you suggested and expanded the listed domains in the uBO addon for Firefox and here is the result for [B]apple.com[/B]. [ATTACH type="full" alt="Screen Shot 2020-06-16 at 2.22.58 PM.png"]242875[/ATTACH] In this case, it seems like some [B]akamaiedge.net [/B]subdomain[B] [/B]is masking [B][URL="http://www.apple.com"]www.apple.com[/URL][/B] (not vice-versa) since the Apple domain is the one in small font under the canonical domain. The same thing happens with a subdomain of [B]omtrdc.net[/B] masking some "securemvt" Apple subdomain. So we're still in the same dilemma. Had [B]apple.com[/B] been the one masking [B]akamaiedge.net[/B] and [B]omtrdc.net[/B], I could see how this would be a CNAME issue. But in this case, the Akamai and OMTRDC.net domains are masking Apple domains, not the other way around. Doesn't that mean they both [U]should be[/U] showing up in Chromium-based browsers? Because they're not the ones being masked, they are the ones doing the masking. And while Chromium-based browsers don't have the ability to uncloak masked domains, they are still supposed to list the main domains that load up (which the Akamai and OMTRDC.net domains seem to be). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top