Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Web Extensions
uBlock Origin/Nano Adblocker - User Tips, Questions and Issues Thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 92963" data-source="post: 962812"><p>[USER=80838]@Jan Willy[/USER]</p><p></p><p>I am using all Next DNS malware protections and added blocking all non-latin character domains, so I think next DNS offers good services (for free).</p><p></p><p> Using first party script blocking is just an additional measure which blocks websites I normally don't visit anyway.</p><p></p><p>But you are raising a good point for discussion: with all improvements in Chromium based browsers, do people still need to block (third-party)scripts and iframes? Do No-Script and uBO medium mode add a lot more hassle for little real world security benefits?</p><p></p><p>That is why I mentioned the security measures Google withdraw for iframes. To be honest I have not made up my mind on that.</p><p></p><p>So opinions of members regarding the practical protection of uBO medium mode for Chromium browsers (not Firefox) are welcome.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 92963, post: 962812"] [USER=80838]@Jan Willy[/USER] I am using all Next DNS malware protections and added blocking all non-latin character domains, so I think next DNS offers good services (for free). Using first party script blocking is just an additional measure which blocks websites I normally don't visit anyway. But you are raising a good point for discussion: with all improvements in Chromium based browsers, do people still need to block (third-party)scripts and iframes? Do No-Script and uBO medium mode add a lot more hassle for little real world security benefits? That is why I mentioned the security measures Google withdraw for iframes. To be honest I have not made up my mind on that. So opinions of members regarding the practical protection of uBO medium mode for Chromium browsers (not Firefox) are welcome. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
