Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Web Extensions
uBo or AdGuard + NoScript
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 95367" data-source="post: 1006146"><p>I was talking within the framework of using strict blocking of JavaScript.</p><p></p><p>The complexity of the rules depends upon 1) if the user adopts a strict blocking model and 2) the websites themselves. Websites do change behind the scenes. A user that frequents Team Server, GitHub, BitBucket, TestRails, etc are going to do a lot of rules tweaking and management. SSO login represents a unique problem when blocking scripts. That's more rules tweaking and management.</p><p></p><p>The "inconvenience" is not overwhelming, but it can be an occasional nuisance. It certainly involves time. Enough time that one has to weigh the benefits of a strict blocking model to the time spent creating and managing the rules. Personally I calculated that the benefit was not worth it. I suppose it boils down to how patient and willing the user is. Then there are those occasions where a rule does not fix a website breakage; and the extension has to be disabled for a site.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 95367, post: 1006146"] I was talking within the framework of using strict blocking of JavaScript. The complexity of the rules depends upon 1) if the user adopts a strict blocking model and 2) the websites themselves. Websites do change behind the scenes. A user that frequents Team Server, GitHub, BitBucket, TestRails, etc are going to do a lot of rules tweaking and management. SSO login represents a unique problem when blocking scripts. That's more rules tweaking and management. The "inconvenience" is not overwhelming, but it can be an occasional nuisance. It certainly involves time. Enough time that one has to weigh the benefits of a strict blocking model to the time spent creating and managing the rules. Personally I calculated that the benefit was not worth it. I suppose it boils down to how patient and willing the user is. Then there are those occasions where a rule does not fix a website breakage; and the extension has to be disabled for a site. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top