Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="danb" data-source="post: 982219" data-attributes="member: 62850">We might implement DefenderUI into VS at some point, maybe in the next 4-6 months.&nbsp; But then we would need to have a VS with DefenderUI and one without, so that could really complicate things <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" />.BTW, a few people have asked if we were going to release a portable version of DefenderUI.&nbsp; If you disable the &quot;Start with Windows&quot; option in DefenderUI, it essentially acts as a portable app that is installed in the appropriate place (Program Files), and the DefenderUIService does not start when the &quot;Start with Windows&quot; option is disabled.&nbsp; Once the user starts DefenderUI, then the DefenderUIService starts, so it is pretty much like a portable app with this option disabled.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="danb, post: 982219, member: 62850"] We might implement DefenderUI into VS at some point, maybe in the next 4-6 months. But then we would need to have a VS with DefenderUI and one without, so that could really complicate things ;). BTW, a few people have asked if we were going to release a portable version of DefenderUI. If you disable the "Start with Windows" option in DefenderUI, it essentially acts as a portable app that is installed in the appropriate place (Program Files), and the DefenderUIService does not start when the "Start with Windows" option is disabled. Once the user starts DefenderUI, then the DefenderUIService starts, so it is pretty much like a portable app with this option disabled. [/QUOTE]

Verification