Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 823865" data-source="post: 847076">In fact you can&#039;t compare Appguard with VS from the start. Appguard monitors dlls and drivers in addition to executables and has memory containment, which VS even with WLC can&#039;t do.So to me, AG is still a more comprehensive solution, like any HIPS is more comprehensive than Appguard.Wider the scope, more solid the solution is against various malware attack chains.In our time, executables aren&#039;t only the only malware types.Also Appguard is SRP, VS still an anti-exe, not the same mechanism to begin with.The only apps you can compare AG&nbsp; with is Windows SRP/Applocker and other SRP in some corporate suite like Symantec EP, etc..The only apps you can compare VS with is NVT ExeRadarPro or Secure AP (especially SAP which also use VT like VS).So unless VS becomes full-fledged SRP and offers some memory protection, which I doubt it will ever happen, there is no comparison, there is no one is better than another. You can only compare what is comparable.Im surprise you still don&#039;t know the difference between them...But the poster above is right, as a home user, better use VS than AG.VS is free and oriented for beginners, AG isn&#039;t for them,&nbsp; and not saying using an obsolete version like v4 is foolish and that is true for any security software.Not saying than the main version of Appguard, the Enterprise one, not Solo, is way above that, there is not even a chance any home user solution be compared with. And no home user can&#039;t even&nbsp; deploy it properly since it needs its own Windows server like any serious corporate solutions.So please [USER=58943]@ForgottenSeer 58943[/USER], know all the facts before stating stuff. It is become annoying and tiring to correct over and over the same things when people talk about what they don&#039;t seems to understand despite dozen of explanations...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 823865, post: 847076"] In fact you can't compare Appguard with VS from the start. Appguard monitors dlls and drivers in addition to executables and has memory containment, which VS even with WLC can't do. So to me, AG is still a more comprehensive solution, like any HIPS is more comprehensive than Appguard. Wider the scope, more solid the solution is against various malware attack chains. In our time, executables aren't only the only malware types. Also Appguard is SRP, VS still an anti-exe, not the same mechanism to begin with. The only apps you can compare AG with is Windows SRP/Applocker and other SRP in some corporate suite like Symantec EP, etc.. The only apps you can compare VS with is NVT ExeRadarPro or Secure AP (especially SAP which also use VT like VS). So unless VS becomes full-fledged SRP and offers some memory protection, which I doubt it will ever happen, there is no comparison, there is no one is better than another. You can only compare what is comparable. Im surprise you still don't know the difference between them... But the poster above is right, as a home user, better use VS than AG. VS is free and oriented for beginners, AG isn't for them, and not saying using an obsolete version like v4 is foolish and that is true for any security software. Not saying than the main version of Appguard, the Enterprise one, not Solo, is way above that, there is not even a chance any home user solution be compared with. And no home user can't even deploy it properly since it needs its own Windows server like any serious corporate solutions. So please [USER=58943]@ForgottenSeer 58943[/USER], know all the facts before stating stuff. It is become annoying and tiring to correct over and over the same things when people talk about what they don't seems to understand despite dozen of explanations... [/QUOTE]

Verification