pablozi said:
Biozfear said:
I am still considering EAM but ESET still has less memory usage overall.
What do you think?
Are you serious? ESET eats about 60 MB of RAM while EAM ten times less while idle.
ESET is not heavy as all think it uses 60-80mb of RAM only because it loads all its signatures in the RAM for quick detection and scanning this also reduces the read and write of hard disk compared to others If you can point out one thing in ESET than that would be its Hips which under default settings is useless (i recommend learning mode for 10-20days) and since i game a lot i have tested each and every security suite for my needs and found that ESET is the only suite that gives me the highest frame rate in games without lags its almost like being without antivirus
I know EAM uses 5-10mbs of ram when idle bt then again u cannot compare EAM with ESET lightness only on the Basis on Ram usage
If anyone can do a performance test for both with default settings or highest possible settings or can link to the results of performance test on other website than it would be helpful
Thanks
Edit found a link to performance test of ESET with other av and but EAM is not included can anyone post EAM results or comparison
Link 1 http://www.av-comparatives.org/comparativesreviews/performance-tests
link 2 http://www.antivirusware.com/testing/performance/
not latest but EAM an ESET included
http://www.raymond.cc/antivirus/
Thanks