Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
Video Reviews - Security and Privacy
Webroot Internet Security Plus 12.21.19
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 823865" data-source="post: 861887"><p>Well know issues since a decade. </p><p>The culprit, I tend to believe from my testing, is the journaling mechanism, who start recording the activity of low-reputation or unknown program/processes, and write in the WRdata folder. </p><p></p><p></p><p>Because Webroot is new to script-based attack vectors, the anti-script protection was added around a year ago...Quite late... </p><p></p><p>Also fileless attacks uses legitimate LOLbins which are probably all whitelisted.</p><p>I don't remember you can tweak its BB to block them manually. </p><p></p><p>They promised a true anti-exploit feature (a la EMET) to prevent memory-based threats (trademark of fileless attacks) but the project seems dead in the water...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 823865, post: 861887"] Well know issues since a decade. The culprit, I tend to believe from my testing, is the journaling mechanism, who start recording the activity of low-reputation or unknown program/processes, and write in the WRdata folder. Because Webroot is new to script-based attack vectors, the anti-script protection was added around a year ago...Quite late... Also fileless attacks uses legitimate LOLbins which are probably all whitelisted. I don't remember you can tweak its BB to block them manually. They promised a true anti-exploit feature (a la EMET) to prevent memory-based threats (trademark of fileless attacks) but the project seems dead in the water... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
