Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Other security for Windows, Mac, Linux
Webroot, the only small AV left.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="509322" data-source="post: 721767"><p>So ? - please read my reply carefully. I've run Windows Defender for decades and never been infected because my system was not exposed to threats in the first place - which is my whole point. According to that guy's post logic, not being infected over decades using Windows Defender makes Windows Defender better than Webroot. And that just ain't true for a number of reasons. It's a "populist" measure, but the amount of time a system goes uninfected is not a validation of a security soft's protection quality - again for a number of reasons.</p><p></p><p>Take a poll, most people who run an AV or internet security suite never have anything quarantined over a long period of time - sometimes many years. That's not because the installed security soft has such awesome protection, but much more likely due to the fact that their system has not been exposed to any attacks, malware has not been introduced to the system, etc. What is really protecting their system is probability and low-risk exposure. In other words, the system has managed to dodge bullets.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="509322, post: 721767"] So ? - please read my reply carefully. I've run Windows Defender for decades and never been infected because my system was not exposed to threats in the first place - which is my whole point. According to that guy's post logic, not being infected over decades using Windows Defender makes Windows Defender better than Webroot. And that just ain't true for a number of reasons. It's a "populist" measure, but the amount of time a system goes uninfected is not a validation of a security soft's protection quality - again for a number of reasons. Take a poll, most people who run an AV or internet security suite never have anything quarantined over a long period of time - sometimes many years. That's not because the installed security soft has such awesome protection, but much more likely due to the fact that their system has not been exposed to any attacks, malware has not been introduced to the system, etc. What is really protecting their system is probability and low-risk exposure. In other words, the system has managed to dodge bullets. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top