Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
What is your security combo lacking?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AtlBo" data-source="post: 809713" data-attributes="member: 32547"><p>Comodo FW + Forticlient + NVT OSArmor + AppCheck A/Rw + EMET</p><p></p><p>AppCheck and EMET are only here as toys and for science and study. I don't run games, but they are extremely light anyway. Otherwise, everything is covered with the first 3 in the most general sense.</p><p></p><p>For me, this combo lacks effective interaction with the user. There is plenty of interaction with Comodo, but the alerts presentation should be so much better and should represent the protection scheme way better. Forticlient's web blocks are awesome, but its scan dialog is slightly clumsy in that it doesn't minimize.</p><p></p><p>All in all it's just little details that end up being super annoying over the long haul. The protection part I feel relatively good about, but I wish especially Comodo's alert flow was better designed, more elaborate, and better choreographed. One other thing about Comodo. The program doesn't notify of the intervention of the cloud like it should.</p><p></p><p>Also, btw, NTV OSArmor's limited options feel a little bit binding. I like the exclusion dialog, but sometimes a simple allow once would be nice. OSA has probably 200 protections bundled together, so the first alert about something running from downloads might just be something I would like to know/see (or external drive, etc.), while I am really trusting in the later alerts for protection. Come to think of it, an option to see a notification for a setting rather than an alert might be really awesome, at least for some of the commonly triggered settings...END RANT about FREE software.</p><p></p><p>Nice idea for a thread [USER=53544]@RoboMan[/USER]...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AtlBo, post: 809713, member: 32547"] Comodo FW + Forticlient + NVT OSArmor + AppCheck A/Rw + EMET AppCheck and EMET are only here as toys and for science and study. I don't run games, but they are extremely light anyway. Otherwise, everything is covered with the first 3 in the most general sense. For me, this combo lacks effective interaction with the user. There is plenty of interaction with Comodo, but the alerts presentation should be so much better and should represent the protection scheme way better. Forticlient's web blocks are awesome, but its scan dialog is slightly clumsy in that it doesn't minimize. All in all it's just little details that end up being super annoying over the long haul. The protection part I feel relatively good about, but I wish especially Comodo's alert flow was better designed, more elaborate, and better choreographed. One other thing about Comodo. The program doesn't notify of the intervention of the cloud like it should. Also, btw, NTV OSArmor's limited options feel a little bit binding. I like the exclusion dialog, but sometimes a simple allow once would be nice. OSA has probably 200 protections bundled together, so the first alert about something running from downloads might just be something I would like to know/see (or external drive, etc.), while I am really trusting in the later alerts for protection. Come to think of it, an option to see a notification for a setting rather than an alert might be really awesome, at least for some of the commonly triggered settings...END RANT about FREE software. Nice idea for a thread [USER=53544]@RoboMan[/USER]... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top