Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
What will cybersecurity software look like in the future, say 10-30 years from now?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 95367" data-source="post: 1005201"><p>The statement was 100% accurate about SRP and refutes your claim that SRP is onerous because it causes breakages.</p><p></p><p>VoodooShield is a simple product. It is not difficult to understand how it works.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Users aren't doing things on enterprise systems where a contextual engine is even needed. Inconvenience - if you can call less than 3 minutes for an admin to create and deploy a very rarely needed allow exception - is not a problem in that space.</p><p></p><p>On the other hand, secops is not going to install a consumer product like VoodooShield that presents alerts and requires decisions from the person sitting in front of the system on a network of 27,000 endpoints. In enterprise, the decisions are made by the admins.</p><p></p><p></p><p>SRP is hardly dead. SRP in its various flavors remains a huge part of Windows security. In fact, it remains a significant part of the recent Microsoft-DoD contracts. There's millions of endpoints running SRP and Microsoft will keep supporting both the "classic" and newest version (WDAC).</p><p></p><p>Saying SRP is dead is hardly factual, but I think you need to say it for your own comfort.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 95367, post: 1005201"] The statement was 100% accurate about SRP and refutes your claim that SRP is onerous because it causes breakages. VoodooShield is a simple product. It is not difficult to understand how it works. Users aren't doing things on enterprise systems where a contextual engine is even needed. Inconvenience - if you can call less than 3 minutes for an admin to create and deploy a very rarely needed allow exception - is not a problem in that space. On the other hand, secops is not going to install a consumer product like VoodooShield that presents alerts and requires decisions from the person sitting in front of the system on a network of 27,000 endpoints. In enterprise, the decisions are made by the admins. SRP is hardly dead. SRP in its various flavors remains a huge part of Windows security. In fact, it remains a significant part of the recent Microsoft-DoD contracts. There's millions of endpoints running SRP and Microsoft will keep supporting both the "classic" and newest version (WDAC). Saying SRP is dead is hardly factual, but I think you need to say it for your own comfort. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top