The point of the post was whether you guys trust these results?
Eset at the moment is way down the list,however several days ago it was almost at the top,which is to some extent understandable given the quality of the sigs variations etc!
The results look pretty accurate but still there is always room for errors.
If you are a user that never pays attention, clicks on everything, downloads and runs suspicious files, then these results might mean something to you but not much since no AV's will offer 100% protection because all are failures to the careless user.
If you are a careful user who always pays attention, never downloads or runs suspicious files and utilize UAC prompts, then these results will mean nothing at all to you since all zero-day malware requires the user to manually download and manually run an infected file(s).
I never put my complete trust into any testing site since each end user may never come in contact the the malware samples used in the testing or the wild but may come in contact with other malware infections not included in the sample testing. Your actions will determine what you will come in contact with and depending on how you will deal with it will determine if you will get infected.
Thanks.
