- Jun 21, 2013
- 1,492
Thanks!
I'm guessing that the first link would be the installer with Offline AV (If you don't have an AV). The second one would be the installer without Offline AV (SAP as Companion AV).
What's wrong with Secureaplus? If anything?
- Thread starter motox781
- Start date
- Status
I'm guessing that the first link would be the installer with Offline AV (If you don't have an AV). The second one would be the installer without Offline AV (SAP as Companion AV).
Thats my guess too But I am confused with the mention "Upgrade patch".
- Feb 15, 2012
- 2,128
The only thing I hate is the offline av which afaik is still clam av (it's fairly heavy in ram if I remember right and has lots of fp's), otherwise SAP is pretty light and does a great job both from my experience and from the reviews i've watched. I still plan on using it in the near future 
Last edited:
I installed it previously & after sometime uninstalled it...initial scan after 1 hour was at 1% And horrible GUI & Alerts...big tabs & poor choice of color & combination...bad & ugly & messy look.The only thing I hate is the offline av which afaik is still clam av, otherwise it's pretty light and does a great job both from my experience and from the reviews i've watched. I still plan on using it in the near future
They should retire the GUI department, heck kids do better doodle & color combination honestly.
- Feb 15, 2012
- 2,128
I do agree the gui isn't the greatest, but it offers very good protection and without the offline av it is very light as I said before.
Its simply horrible IMHO, fake AVs have much better design.
And popups details are like should I quarantine, should I block, should I click more, lets find the info...its a ride man.
- Aug 2, 2015
- 4,286
I have said just that in a previous thread lol, something to the effect that it looks as though a group of 3rd graders designed the GUI.
It is very strange the size discrepancy between the installers for US and India, that worries me.
- Feb 15, 2012
- 2,128
The only thing that I don't like about it is the "referral program", it's shady and it forces users to make positive comments or articles. The more you spam with it the more points you get and you can exchange that for Pro Licenses.
It has a decent protection, but I will not recommended. In the end, my vote is "I don't know" because depends on the user (it also has a few issue with signed malware and PUPs).
It has a decent protection, but I will not recommended. In the end, my vote is "I don't know" because depends on the user (it also has a few issue with signed malware and PUPs).
- Jul 6, 2015
- 737
They seem to have issues with servers going down? Gonna be a pain if you need to scan something and their server is off line!
- Status
Similar threads
