- Dec 19, 2016
- 48
There are many antivirus which may not perform well in avtest.org and avcomparatives tests but users may give positive response with there own experience can you share those information.
Please provide comments and solutions that are helpful to the author of this topic.
Webroot seems to not submit it's product for testing on any of these 2 labs. Anyways, it is a wonderful antivirus. It was developed to be complementary but does quite better!Webroot. It has some aggressive settings and process control options.
Hold your horses there. You only trust those 7 AVs? There are lots of good AV companies & the majority of the ones that exist are good quality & deserve more respect - 360 Total Security, MalwareBytes V3, ESET, Sophos, etc are all good AVs which you don't trust? I would trust ESET & MalwareBytes over Norton, Avira & F-Secure.Wouldn't trust a AV that got sub par scores in Av tests. Using AV's that don't test well is bad.
Sure you can argue with Av tests methods but the end results are almost the same across the board.
You want a Av with a large reputation service. More samples = more detection's.
I only trust a few Av companies. Kaspersky, Norton, F-Secure, Emsosift, Bitdefender, Avira, Avast.
The rest are not worth my time.
is this free edition and does it uses its own engineTwister Antivirus, a product which contains strong heuristics, mechanistic behavior detection and even signatures. (Definitely underrated, but it works the job very well)
Although it kills on False positive rate based on numerous test.
Link to Twister Antivirus by Filseclab
Seems great. A Chinese product I guess. So you've tested this or read a review about it?Twister Antivirus, a product which contains strong heuristics, mechanistic behavior detection and even signatures. (Definitely underrated, but it works the job very well)
Although it kills on False positive rate based on numerous test.
Link to Twister Antivirus by Filseclab