- Dec 20, 2014
- 619
Which better in your option?
- Thread starter Maxxx58
- Start date
- Status
- Aug 31, 2014
- 182
I believe KIS is better although they both are very good products .
- Nov 25, 2014
- 402
Both are awesome but KIS better one. Though I prefer first setup, already intended to implement it within few days.
- Mar 15, 2011
- 13,070
They have really good products.
KIS = known to be very good suite with lots of components that you can configure especially Application Control which if set for untrusted then can blocked all applications were unknown by digital signatures and other properties. Known for well adjusted firewall components too besides of realtime protection.
EAM = holds very strong AV with 3 basic features you have; file shield, web filter, BB and cloud feature.
It depends to your preference status.
KIS = known to be very good suite with lots of components that you can configure especially Application Control which if set for untrusted then can blocked all applications were unknown by digital signatures and other properties. Known for well adjusted firewall components too besides of realtime protection.
EAM = holds very strong AV with 3 basic features you have; file shield, web filter, BB and cloud feature.
It depends to your preference status.
- May 9, 2014
- 396
No doubt for this, just used Kaspersky Internet Security 2015 [15.0.1.415.598]
- Jul 25, 2014
- 272
- Oct 2, 2014
- 805
Both are good, but Kaspersky is a bit more solid at it's components and development.
- Oct 9, 2014
- 579
both are good but personally i prefer to Kaspersky, its really a great and solid AV.
- Dec 20, 2014
- 619
- Jan 31, 2014
- 888
Emsisoft. Lighter and faster. Updates are easier. Simpler approach to malware: head-to-head and disregardig features that could be of less value in fighting malware.
- Dec 4, 2013
- 2,800
I'd like to vote for both because, believe it or not, I have one activation key corresponding for each of our computers with 1 of each of these AVs, yet neither of our present ones have expired, so I cannot vote. As it stands now, the score is 4 to 12 Advantage Kasperski! Unless I find a time machine I can climb into, I'll have to come back long after this thread has been forgotten, and you'll know my vote when you see an alert for this thread from a long time ago!!
vote. As it stands now, the score is 4 to 12 Advantage Kasperski! Unless I find a time machine I can climb into, I'll have to come back long after this thread has been forgotten, and you'll know my vote when you see an alert for this thread from a long time ago!!
- Jul 7, 2014
- 1,017
Well are almost same protection wise. Rest depends on your personal choice . My vote is already present in my signature.
. My vote is already present in my signature.
- Jun 10, 2014
- 316
Haven't used Kaspersky since it was 2012-2013 release... for the past year or so I have been on EAM + W7F. I recently decided to drop the AV and just keep the FW, lost the plot... From what I have heard, in Kaspersky you can go nuts with packet rules from the internet side of things. So I guess that is a bonus for Kaspersky. However, I was and still am pretty impressed with EAM. I used to do all my firewall mods in W7FwAS, till I got Windows Firewall Control. It made it a lot easier to muck around with inbound/outbound rules.
Scan speeds improved significantly in EAM v9. I think overall strain on my PC was reduced as well. I could even untick the memory optimization tickbox without feeling any dramas (mind you, having 16gb ram helps too). I would have loved to combine the AV and the FW together, like a real IS package, but EIS didn't tickle my fancy enough and I really can't be bothered learning another application just for the sake of giving myself a happy ending.
Anyone out there have an idea about how KIS handles HIPS?
Scan speeds improved significantly in EAM v9. I think overall strain on my PC was reduced as well. I could even untick the memory optimization tickbox without feeling any dramas (mind you, having 16gb ram helps too). I would have loved to combine the AV and the FW together, like a real IS package, but EIS didn't tickle my fancy enough and I really can't be bothered learning another application just for the sake of giving myself a happy ending.
Anyone out there have an idea about how KIS handles HIPS?
Last edited:
- Jan 2, 2015
- 29
- Dec 20, 2014
- 619
Why you never try Emsisoft? Do you think you will try it in the future?I never try Emsisoft Anti-Malware, but I think Kaspersky is much better
- Jan 2, 2015
- 29
Honestly, I don't know a lot of anti-virus vendors, then I joined this forum to find more about it. Yea, maybe in the future I try Emsisoft
- Dec 20, 2014
- 619
I just installed Emsisoft Anti-Malware on my new machine for new year 2 days ago. Seems it's awesome!Honestly, I don't know a lot of anti-virus vendors, then I joined this forum to find more about it. Yea, maybe in the future I try Emsisoft
- Dec 18, 2014
- 266
Each of them is good. EAM is a fast, light and has good support.
The base is common sense
The base is common sense
- Oct 20, 2014
- 804
Both do the job, I give an edge to the KIS. It might be more reliable overall?
- Jun 10, 2014
- 316
Does KIS use the BitDefender engine as well, or is it just Emsisoft?
- Status
