Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Browsers
Web Extensions
Which block lists do you use with UBO, AG and ABP ?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="forgottenuser79643" data-source="post: 935360" data-attributes="member: 88069"><p>I find to have large success on relatives' computers using uBlock Origins in easy mode with:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Adguard Base filter+Easylist, Adguard Dutch, Adguard Annoyances;</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The Blocklist Projects: ads filter(!!)</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Easyprivacy</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">All uBlock Filters (uBlock Specific)</li> </ul><p><span style="font-size: 12px">!! - This project contains multiple specialized, separate filter lists. I only took the filter marked as 'Ads Filter'.</span></p><p></p><p>Filters I enabled a few months ago for them with success, but being optional as they have done without for a long time.</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Badmojr/1hosts Lite</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">StevenBlack/hosts</li> </ul><p>As well as a few static filters of my own making:</p><p>[CODE]</p><p>! ----- Annoyances -----</p><p>##.gdpr-cookie-layer</p><p>bol.com,buienradar.nl,omroepgelderland.nl##body:style(overflow: visible !important;)</p><p>buienradar.nl##.onboard-background</p><p>buienradar.nl##div[class="onboard-popup-container"]</p><p></p><p># [google.*]</p><p>||consent.google.com^</p><p>google.*##div[owner][jsowner] > div[jsname][aria-hidden]</p><p>google.*##div[class][role="dialog"][tabindex]</p><p>google.*##div[owner] > div[class]:has(div[class][role="button"])</p><p></p><p># [youtube.com]</p><p>! Hide data protection laws and privacy policy popup banner.</p><p>youtube.com###interstitial</p><p>! Consent dialog.</p><p>youtube.com##+js(set, ytInitialData.topbar.desktopTopbarRenderer.interstitial.consentBumpRenderer.forceConsent, false)</p><p>youtube.com##+js(json-prune, [].response.topbar.desktopTopbarRenderer.interstitial.consentBumpRenderer)</p><p>youtube.com##+js(json-prune, topbar.desktopTopbarRenderer.interstitial.consentBumpRenderer)</p><p>! Login dialog.</p><p>youtube.com##+js(set, ytInitialPlayerResponse.auxiliaryUi.messageRenderers.upsellDialogRenderer.isVisible, false)</p><p>youtube.com##+js(set, ytInitialData.overlay.upsellDialogRenderer.isVisible, false)</p><p>youtube.com##+js(json-prune, [].playerResponse.auxiliaryUi.messageRenderers.upsellDialogRenderer)[/CODE]</p><p></p><p>You could try OISD.</p><p></p><p>Though I tried the famed OISD, but for them if something gets blocked or breaks, since its such a gigantic list... They don't understand what to do, so for them, I steered clear from it (technology-/digitally "Challenged"). I have heard no complaints so far for me to disable a list or unbreak a specific website, other than whitelisting Twitter, Facebook and Facebook affiliated services (WhatsApp, Instagram). The Adguard base, Annoyances, Dutch filters being the only onces containing cosmetic filtering values.</p><p></p><p>Though ended up disabling Easylist cookie list due to some websites have their cookie banner hidden with it, but ending up being broken with the page scrolling. Without it, I had to unbreak 3 domains with their browsing habits for page scrolling using "##body:style(overflow: visible !important; )". Though some cookie banners still do show up. Still looking for a better way to handle those for their doing.</p><p></p><p>edit: You could try to manage it with NextDNS and use Adguard purely for cosmetic and cookie filtering.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="forgottenuser79643, post: 935360, member: 88069"] I find to have large success on relatives' computers using uBlock Origins in easy mode with: [LIST] [*]Adguard Base filter+Easylist, Adguard Dutch, Adguard Annoyances; [*]The Blocklist Projects: ads filter(!!) [*]Easyprivacy [*]All uBlock Filters (uBlock Specific) [/LIST] [SIZE=3]!! - This project contains multiple specialized, separate filter lists. I only took the filter marked as 'Ads Filter'.[/SIZE] Filters I enabled a few months ago for them with success, but being optional as they have done without for a long time. [LIST] [*]Badmojr/1hosts Lite [*]StevenBlack/hosts [/LIST] As well as a few static filters of my own making: [CODE] ! ----- Annoyances ----- ##.gdpr-cookie-layer bol.com,buienradar.nl,omroepgelderland.nl##body:style(overflow: visible !important;) buienradar.nl##.onboard-background buienradar.nl##div[class="onboard-popup-container"] # [google.*] ||consent.google.com^ google.*##div[owner][jsowner] > div[jsname][aria-hidden] google.*##div[class][role="dialog"][tabindex] google.*##div[owner] > div[class]:has(div[class][role="button"]) # [youtube.com] ! Hide data protection laws and privacy policy popup banner. youtube.com###interstitial ! Consent dialog. youtube.com##+js(set, ytInitialData.topbar.desktopTopbarRenderer.interstitial.consentBumpRenderer.forceConsent, false) youtube.com##+js(json-prune, [].response.topbar.desktopTopbarRenderer.interstitial.consentBumpRenderer) youtube.com##+js(json-prune, topbar.desktopTopbarRenderer.interstitial.consentBumpRenderer) ! Login dialog. youtube.com##+js(set, ytInitialPlayerResponse.auxiliaryUi.messageRenderers.upsellDialogRenderer.isVisible, false) youtube.com##+js(set, ytInitialData.overlay.upsellDialogRenderer.isVisible, false) youtube.com##+js(json-prune, [].playerResponse.auxiliaryUi.messageRenderers.upsellDialogRenderer)[/CODE] You could try OISD. Though I tried the famed OISD, but for them if something gets blocked or breaks, since its such a gigantic list... They don't understand what to do, so for them, I steered clear from it (technology-/digitally "Challenged"). I have heard no complaints so far for me to disable a list or unbreak a specific website, other than whitelisting Twitter, Facebook and Facebook affiliated services (WhatsApp, Instagram). The Adguard base, Annoyances, Dutch filters being the only onces containing cosmetic filtering values. Though ended up disabling Easylist cookie list due to some websites have their cookie banner hidden with it, but ending up being broken with the page scrolling. Without it, I had to unbreak 3 domains with their browsing habits for page scrolling using "##body:style(overflow: visible !important; )". Though some cookie banners still do show up. Still looking for a better way to handle those for their doing. edit: You could try to manage it with NextDNS and use Adguard purely for cosmetic and cookie filtering. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top
