There isn’t a single “best” AI overall – different models are stronger at different things, and they also change very fast with new releases.which is the best AI? 1 must be better than the others.![]()
thanks in advance
Each module has its useswhich is the best AI? 1 must be better than the others.
thanks in advance
research.There isn’t a single “best” AI overall – different models are stronger at different things, and they also change very fast with new releases.
How it usually breaks down
- ChatGPT (OpenAI) – Very strong general assistant, great with code, explanations, and writing. Widely integrated into tools and services. Good “all‑rounder”.
- Claude (Anthropic) – Often preferred for long, structured writing (documents, emails, analysis) and for being more “cautious”/aligned. Many people like its style for reasoning tasks.
- Google Gemini – Well integrated with Google services (Drive, Docs, Gmail), decent coding and search‑style tasks. Convenient if you’re deep in the Google ecosystem.
- Local / open‑source models (e.g. Llama variants, Qwen, etc.) – Best for privacy and control (run on your own PC/server), heavily customizable, but require more technical setup and usually a good GPU for top performance.
How to choose “best” for you
Ask yourself:
- Main use? Coding, documents, general chat, research, translating, image work?
- Privacy needs? Cloud AI vs. local models you control.
- Do you care more about raw capability, writing style, or tool integration (Office, Google, IDEs, etc.)?
If you say what you mainly want to use it for (coding, study help, content writing, security research, etc.), I can give a more concrete “for your case, I’d pick X > Y > Z” ranking.
For free AI and mainly research, I’d focus on tools that are good at web search + citations rather than pure “chat”.research.
thank you all for the replies.
Learn how to maximize your knowledge and ability to leverage AI before asking "What is best AI?".which is the best AI? 1 must be better than the others.
thanks in advance
Free AI is frustrating when you actually need to use it for a serious task. It will eat up your prompts quickly dancing around the task and your stuck waiting 12 hours to proceed a little more. If you seriously want the very best AI can offer, you need a paid account and to learn how to prompt "communicate" with the AI, it to s really that simple. Using AI as a search engine is just a waste of a valuable resource."Free" AI is NFL = Not for Long
Quote from PCMag:
"Free AI is unlikely to remain economically feasible in the long term. The infrastructure, energy, and labor costs behind AI are immense, and while companies may offer free tiers to attract users, sustained access will almost certainly require monetization models such as subscriptions, ads, or enterprise licensing."
Microsoft is currently in the process of scaling back CoPilot for non-paying users. Others as well. Oh, AI will still be available but with limitations that will compel people to pay if they really want or need the full access and features.
Governments always have the option of raising taxes and funding the AI bandwagon. Then AI operators always have Patreon and such, a place to beg for money.
Probably, like all "free" software and service models, paying subscribers will subsidize all the freeloaders. However, I think there's less willingness to adopt that same unrestrained model when it comes to AI.
I agree. However, since I know my stuff and I can easily spot errors in the data and informational returns/outputs, I can use it without much of any instruction sets to do "fast-and-convenient" searches that produce analysis that - for the most part - give me what I want and need at the moment.Free AI is frustrating when you actually need to use it for a serious task. It will eat up your prompts quickly dancing around the task and your stuck waiting 12 hours to proceed a little more. If you seriously want the very best AI can offer, you need a paid account and to learn how to prompt "communicate" with the AI, it to s really that simple. Using AI as a search engine is just a waste of a valuable resource.
Exactly as do I and the problem is when you are working a serious task and it hallucinates or simulates something wrongly, you have to stop the flow and burn up more prompts explaining, then it becomes a dance until you are staring at "wait another 12 hours to continue or get a paid account". If I had a dollar for every time this has happened I could have that paid account on those. I do have paid Gemini pro, but I'm not paying more for other AI's. Although I use the free versions as stated they all have their strengths.I agree. However, since I know my stuff and I can easily spot errors in the data and informational returns/outputs, I can use it without much of any instruction sets to do "fast-and-convenient" searches that produce analysis that - for the most part - give me what I want and need at the moment.
However, once I need precision-focused accuracy, then free AI begins to fail.
For stuff that has no Tier 1 sources that the AI can access, then the user needs to know their stuff before the first query.
It is far, far more important to know how to use AI than to ask "What is best AI?".
Effective, meaningful knowledge is not to be had via AI and 10 second Google Foo searches. It is a process and takes sustained time and effort. But people are people.
That takes us all straight to the "Solving people problems with software because people are people - the badly infected pimples on The Universe's arse."
i did. thank you very much.@Brie
I left you a meta prompt in your other thread for research and it works on any LLM. Just copy paste, hit enter and then ask questions and it will do the heavy lifting for you with any AI. You can save the prompt to a note pad ECT and reuse it as many times as you want.
Post in thread 'copilot AI accuracy?' Question - copilot AI accuracy?