Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Dirk41" data-source="post: 569461" data-attributes="member: 50939">Well you were right 15 are not enough. Maybe they are for most important websites. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />But I think for some website someone sign in not often or even once a year , 2FA provided by the website is enough ( or maybe overkill ). Because I suppose that , at least in some forums for example , people don&#039;t use their primary email account (and not connected to the primary ) so in case of theft the thief can only spam on the forum.And maybe the recovery email ( where you receive the second step of 2FA )is protected by the pw manager or you receive the second step on a device only you can accessSo I will go back to another solution but I think 15 could be enough for many people <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="Dirk41, post: 569461, member: 50939"] Well you were right 15 are not enough. Maybe they are for most important websites. :) But I think for some website someone sign in not often or even once a year , 2FA provided by the website is enough ( or maybe overkill ). Because I suppose that , at least in some forums for example , people don't use their primary email account (and not connected to the primary ) so in case of theft the thief can only spam on the forum. And maybe the recovery email ( where you receive the second step of 2FA )is protected by the pw manager or you receive the second step on a device only you can access So I will go back to another solution but I think 15 could be enough for many people :) [/QUOTE]

Verification