Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="HarborFront" data-source="post: 852771" data-attributes="member: 55987">Mullvad VPN recent (4 Jan 2020) updated review here. Pretty detailed review.[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://cooltechzone.com/mullvad-review[/URL]A concern thoughQuote3. “Bridge” connections (Shadowsocks)All of Mullvad apps support the use of Shadowsocks technology. This technology allows a device to connect to one VPN server while another one is visible at the output. The user can choose both input and output servers. This technology works a bit like Double VPN which <a href="https://cooltechzone.com/nordvpn" target="_blank">NordVPN</a> and <a href="https://cooltechzone.com/surfshark" target="_blank">Surfshark</a> have but doesn’t launch another VPN channel on top of the first one but connects the servers sequentially. This doesn’t affect the connection speed as much as Double VPN does. At the same time, such a method doesn’t create double encryption and therefore, is weaker than double VPN if you need some “paranoid” security measures.UnquoteAnd the android side still not developed yet. Some cons are<ul>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">No kill switch. However, your IP address isn’t leaked at a reconnection. The only time a leak is possible is when you consciously disconnect from the VPN. A simple change of location doesn’t make you lose your protection.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">No Bridge mode.</li>
<li data-xf-list-type="ul">No OpenVPN protocol (but to my mind, it’s actually an advantage).</li>
</ul>So for now I guess it is not possible to use in ChinaNote that review did not mention of Mullvad supports using VPN (Mullvad) over TOR feature. The other VPN provider offering this feature is AirVPN[URL unfurl=&quot;true&quot;]https://mullvad.net/en/help/tor-and-mullvad-vpn/[/URL]I wish Mullvad could have done this much easier for user to use</blockquote>

[QUOTE="HarborFront, post: 852771, member: 55987"] Mullvad VPN recent (4 Jan 2020) updated review here. Pretty detailed review. [URL unfurl="true"]https://cooltechzone.com/mullvad-review[/URL] A concern though Quote 3. [I]“Bridge” connections (Shadowsocks)[/I] All of Mullvad apps support the use of Shadowsocks technology. This technology allows a device to connect to one VPN server while another one is visible at the output. The user can choose both input and output servers. This technology works a bit like Double VPN which [URL='https://cooltechzone.com/nordvpn']NordVPN[/URL] and [URL='https://cooltechzone.com/surfshark']Surfshark[/URL] have but doesn’t launch another VPN channel on top of the first one but connects the servers sequentially. This doesn’t affect the connection speed as much as Double VPN does. At the same time, such a method doesn’t create double encryption and therefore, is weaker than double VPN if you need some “paranoid” security measures. Unquote And the android side still not developed yet. Some cons are [LIST] [*]No kill switch. However, your IP address isn’t leaked at a reconnection. The only time a leak is possible is when you consciously disconnect from the VPN. [B]A simple change of location doesn’t make you lose your protection.[/B] [*]No Bridge mode. [*]No OpenVPN protocol (but to my mind, it’s actually an advantage). [/LIST] So for now I guess it is not possible to use in China Note that review did not mention of Mullvad supports using VPN (Mullvad) over TOR feature. The other VPN provider offering this feature is AirVPN [URL unfurl="true"]https://mullvad.net/en/help/tor-and-mullvad-vpn/[/URL] I wish Mullvad could have done this much easier for user to use [/QUOTE]

Verification