Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="roger_m" data-source="post: 863176" data-attributes="member: 31436">I&#039;m using BulletVPN now.&nbsp; I&#039;m getting very good speeds and the customer support is excellent.&nbsp; For what I can tell, they seem to have a decent privacy policy.&nbsp; You can still buy lifetime licenses for $39 from StackSocial.&nbsp; But as with any VPN, it makes sense to buy a month subscription first, so that you can see how well it works for you, before spending the extra money for a longer subscription.I ditched Windscribe, because although it is an excellent VPN with good speeds and a very stable Windows client, their customer support is terrible.At the moment their Windows client is severely lacking in features, but they are going to be adding more features in a few weeks.I tried Vypr recently, but found that I was getting constant CPU use of around 9 to over 20% from their Windows client, when connected.&nbsp; Their customer support is good, but they said I really need a faster computer to have lower CPU use and that I could expect it to be around 95% at&nbsp; times (which does not sound right).&nbsp; But at least they were responsive and made some attempt to help me.&nbsp; If not for CPU usage issue, I would still be using it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="roger_m, post: 863176, member: 31436"] I'm using BulletVPN now. I'm getting very good speeds and the customer support is excellent. For what I can tell, they seem to have a decent privacy policy. You can still buy lifetime licenses for $39 from StackSocial. But as with any VPN, it makes sense to buy a month subscription first, so that you can see how well it works for you, before spending the extra money for a longer subscription. I ditched Windscribe, because although it is an excellent VPN with good speeds and a very stable Windows client, their customer support is terrible. At the moment their Windows client is severely lacking in features, but they are going to be adding more features in a few weeks. I tried Vypr recently, but found that I was getting constant CPU use of around 9 to over 20% from their Windows client, when connected. Their customer support is good, but they said I really need a faster computer to have lower CPU use and that I could expect it to be around 95% at times (which does not sound right). But at least they were responsive and made some attempt to help me. If not for CPU usage issue, I would still be using it. [/QUOTE]

Verification