Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Aktiffiso" data-source="post: 1092312" data-attributes="member: 11939"><p>Hello, guys, I&#039;m not a vulnerability researcher, but I have a similar opinion, are the managers incorporated into browsers really so insecure?, I see several situations 1.- That the companies that design these managers (Google, Microsoft) do not mention the technologies or make comparisons with other managers, they simply focus on functionality, now the security companies are tremendously cheatful.&nbsp; I once talked to a guy from Emsisoft support and he showed me that Emsisoft had as many eques as avast and that there were many &quot;said shields&quot; functions that the operating system already had. I also had an award to obtain GDATA and I realized that there were some modules that did not work well and that had archaic designs, especially in relation to the tools of that time, mainly in terms of email clients no antispam product worked properly with mail clients such as Windows Live Mail. Another situation is that some companies such as Avast and 1Password have tremendously aggressive and intrusive campaigns with the user to the extent that both avast and avg could be considered PUPs because they are installed together with the browser. In concrete words, I believe that each company has its pros and cons and each model of password manager as well, that&#039;s why I like to read their answers. One question: Are there any independent comparisons of these password manager tools?</p></blockquote><p></p>

[QUOTE="Aktiffiso, post: 1092312, member: 11939"] Hello, guys, I'm not a vulnerability researcher, but I have a similar opinion, are the managers incorporated into browsers really so insecure?, I see several situations 1.- That the companies that design these managers (Google, Microsoft) do not mention the technologies or make comparisons with other managers, they simply focus on functionality, now the security companies are tremendously cheatful. I once talked to a guy from Emsisoft support and he showed me that Emsisoft had as many eques as avast and that there were many "said shields" functions that the operating system already had. I also had an award to obtain GDATA and I realized that there were some modules that did not work well and that had archaic designs, especially in relation to the tools of that time, mainly in terms of email clients no antispam product worked properly with mail clients such as Windows Live Mail. Another situation is that some companies such as Avast and 1Password have tremendously aggressive and intrusive campaigns with the user to the extent that both avast and avg could be considered PUPs because they are installed together with the browser. In concrete words, I believe that each company has its pros and cons and each model of password manager as well, that's why I like to read their answers. One question: Are there any independent comparisons of these password manager tools? [/QUOTE]

Verification