Windows Firewall is more than enough for Home Users, Average Users shouldn't be messing with a Firewall either.
Why some vendors tend to rely on Windows Firewall?
- Thread starter Al-Faqir
- Start date
Please provide comments and solutions that are helpful to the author of this topic.
- Status
- May 4, 2018
- 2,261
I seem to find WF isn't enough compared to Comodo Firewall at default settings. I'm just after something that is compatible with the Web Filter I'm currently using.
~LDogg
Comodo Firewall is just named wrongly, it should be like Comodo Box or something. Think about many who reads that WF isn't enough, fires up in google firewall replacement, end up on Comodo's page, and download CF, oh boy.. from that point new users better be assure they have another device with internet access to google for help why Comodo disabled internet adapter, PC threw out BSOD, etc.. all Joe wanted was to better secure hes system 
Last edited by a moderator:
- May 13, 2017
- 2,685
Except it does not allow IP ranges and they do not intend to implement them. They keep it slightly updated, but it is just another dead end.
Because most home vendors fail horribly at implementing secure firewall software.
Does Comodo still not enable ipv6 filtering by default?
Does Comodo still not enable ipv6 filtering by default?
- Mar 29, 2018
- 7,698
I use TinyWall and love it. No prompts, 3 ways to make rules, learning mode and can be protected with a password. By default, it blocks all except essential processes and what you allow. I know what many say, "it's not developed anymore... blah, blah...), but MS hasn't changed WF at all in years. The only known issue is the out-of-date cert. on TW's site, so you have to download with 3rd party installer here: Windows 10 Privacy Guide - Spring Creators Update. Ask anyone who uses it. They love it. I love it. Tried CF and it blocked stuff I wasn't familiar with since I don't understand Windows processes very much at all. Never had a problem with TW. That's why I went back to it after the CF trial.
- Apr 13, 2013
- 3,224
No it is not!!!!! WF will never ever alert to things (like malware) that are attempting to connect out. The spam email that you receive are probably coming from Zombied systems relying on WF.
- Dec 4, 2013
- 2,800
@LDogg & also oldschool, thank you for mentioning Tiny Wall! For those whom wish to have more control over Windows Firewall, after hearing it spoken of many times, here, I'd finally taken a closer look:
TinyWall - A non-intrusive firewall software solution that was designed to provide some extra security and process monitoring capabili...
https://www.softpedia.com/get/Security/Firewall/TinyWall.sht
Last edited:
- Apr 13, 2013
- 3,224
TinyWall is nice! JUST DON'T RELY ON WF (and don't bother to deactivate it- this may lead to you not getting prompt Updates on Win10).
(Hey, Cats- I missed you!)
(Hey, Cats- I missed you!)
- Dec 4, 2013
- 2,800
I Strongly Agree!
@cruelsister (I've missed YOU too!
) your many detailed videos & instructive guides for users whom wish to become bulletproof using Comodo's Firewall with Auto-Sandbox are surely the Holy Grail to Security for any including all whom many not yet know this! I highly recommend viewing, reading, and enjoying, cruelsister's vast content here on MalwareTips & beyond!
Last edited:
- Dec 4, 2013
- 2,800
Why would WF detect malware? It's a Firewall not an Anti-Malware. Strict WF rules will block as much traffic as any other third-party Firewall.
Then at the same time you say TinyWall is nice, which makes no sense, it uses the WF Platform, it's only a manager at most and won't alert you if malware tries to use outbound connections.
If you want alerts for outbound traffic use WFC or GlassWire, if you want to detect malware trying to use outbound traffic use KIS.
Also, WF has connection logs (allowed and blocked, both inbound and outbound with IP addresses and ports specified).
I thought a person is supposed to put (red) Play Dough in the holes at the back of the computer to plug the firewall.
That's not right ?
Doh !
- Mar 29, 2018
- 7,698
@ForgottenSeer 58943 - where do you find all these pics and their variants?
- May 26, 2014
- 1,149
- Jul 1, 2017
- 1,396
Because firewalls are like anti-keyloggers. If you already have the malware on your computer, what it sends in or out isn't your priority anymore. You are already infected. AVs instead focus on preventing malware from running on your computer to begin with. Detecting malware trying to establish a connection and blocking it should be the job of the AV not your firewall. You know... blocking a behavior. A good behavior blocker/HIPS will do what people think a firewall is supposed to do.
Firewall job is to block unwanted inbound connections, that is it, that was it is original purpose.
Old ITs wanting to block outbound process just had to create rules, as i do actually.
Then some security vendors found interesting to prompt for outbound connections (because they knew their soft will fail somehow), i dont expect WF to do this (however would be nicer if it could).
Then myriads of noobs believed that those functions are mandatory for every FW. No it is not !
Those same noobs believe that the need of an IDS/IPS or the new uber-fancy-skynet feature is necessary , while they poorly setup their system security because of their lack of skills.
Asking for a firewall to protect from malicious outgoing connections is like putting a security guard at your building gate, checking every people going out, hoping to catch the eventual thief...But the thief will go out hiding in the car of a legit occupant (aka using a legit process).
the only case i see to use outbound monitoring is to block some legit programs to call home (blocking built-in ads, updates, telemetry, etc...), for security it is worthless unless the user decide to spend hours/days by going default-deny with programs, ports and IPs.
Windows Firewall does its job decently, you want tighter restrictions, make them yourself with the advanced settings.
Almost all 3rd party firewall installed on Windows uses its platform (WFP), they just add some features to look good.
WF can be turned off by malware, sure, but how you got the malware in the first place...?
What is important is not what goes out but what goes in.
As @DeepWeb said, i dont care if the malware is making outbound connections, it is already too late, if i reach that point i just reformat my system..
Home users don't need high specs firewalls, they need to know how to prevent malware to get in, if they can't get in , there is nothing that get out.
Simple as that.
if i want to seriously protect my traffic, i wont look at 3rd party firewalls, i will directly go buy an endpoint solution plus an hardware firewall/appliance; those are made to really secure a network; compared to them any 3rd party FW in suites looks likes useless toys.
My advice to home users: protect your entry points, select reputable "known-to-be-effective" apps that fill the job, then you won't care of what goes out.
Old ITs wanting to block outbound process just had to create rules, as i do actually.
Then some security vendors found interesting to prompt for outbound connections (because they knew their soft will fail somehow), i dont expect WF to do this (however would be nicer if it could).
Then myriads of noobs believed that those functions are mandatory for every FW. No it is not !
Those same noobs believe that the need of an IDS/IPS or the new uber-fancy-skynet feature is necessary , while they poorly setup their system security because of their lack of skills.
Asking for a firewall to protect from malicious outgoing connections is like putting a security guard at your building gate, checking every people going out, hoping to catch the eventual thief...But the thief will go out hiding in the car of a legit occupant (aka using a legit process).
the only case i see to use outbound monitoring is to block some legit programs to call home (blocking built-in ads, updates, telemetry, etc...), for security it is worthless unless the user decide to spend hours/days by going default-deny with programs, ports and IPs.
Windows Firewall does its job decently, you want tighter restrictions, make them yourself with the advanced settings.
Almost all 3rd party firewall installed on Windows uses its platform (WFP), they just add some features to look good.
WF can be turned off by malware, sure, but how you got the malware in the first place...?
What is important is not what goes out but what goes in.
As @DeepWeb said, i dont care if the malware is making outbound connections, it is already too late, if i reach that point i just reformat my system..
Home users don't need high specs firewalls, they need to know how to prevent malware to get in, if they can't get in , there is nothing that get out.
Simple as that.
if i want to seriously protect my traffic, i wont look at 3rd party firewalls, i will directly go buy an endpoint solution plus an hardware firewall/appliance; those are made to really secure a network; compared to them any 3rd party FW in suites looks likes useless toys.
My advice to home users: protect your entry points, select reputable "known-to-be-effective" apps that fill the job, then you won't care of what goes out.
- Status
Similar threads
