Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
[Windows 7-10] What would be in your opinion the most lightweight yet effective security?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AtlBo" data-source="post: 713583" data-attributes="member: 32547"><p>I agree with much of what you say. The flip side is that Comodo is a security program, and it does have a large TVL that guarantees free passage to hoards of software installations. Also, however, as [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] testifies, Comodo blocks malware...and without alot of FPs. Probably going to be some blocks that users don't like, but when I think of all I can run with Comodo it's really effective software. Now, with a gamer...I would have to do alot of testing with this type of rig. I just don't know how it does with game devs and their super complex programs.</p><p></p><p>One thing I have to say. On one system I have Comodo, Q360, AppCheck A/RW, EMET, and NVT OSArmor. I never have a single conflict, and Comodo may be quirky, but it doesn't break on me any more. I feel safe in SUA under UAC and this security, and the setup has a very small profile system resource-wise. I could exchange Qihoo for any a-v btw, but I do like the program, once it is "tamed".</p><p></p><p>All this said, what's the most important element of all this to me?...NVT OSArmor LOL. Not to encourage it, but if you run Comodo unrecognized outside of Comodo chances are malware won't run with OSA. And it's brand new with I suppose even more to come in the future. I hope to get a chance in the near to work with Hard_Configurator and I'll probably be saying the same thing about it...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AtlBo, post: 713583, member: 32547"] I agree with much of what you say. The flip side is that Comodo is a security program, and it does have a large TVL that guarantees free passage to hoards of software installations. Also, however, as [USER=7463]@cruelsister[/USER] testifies, Comodo blocks malware...and without alot of FPs. Probably going to be some blocks that users don't like, but when I think of all I can run with Comodo it's really effective software. Now, with a gamer...I would have to do alot of testing with this type of rig. I just don't know how it does with game devs and their super complex programs. One thing I have to say. On one system I have Comodo, Q360, AppCheck A/RW, EMET, and NVT OSArmor. I never have a single conflict, and Comodo may be quirky, but it doesn't break on me any more. I feel safe in SUA under UAC and this security, and the setup has a very small profile system resource-wise. I could exchange Qihoo for any a-v btw, but I do like the program, once it is "tamed". All this said, what's the most important element of all this to me?...NVT OSArmor LOL. Not to encourage it, but if you run Comodo unrecognized outside of Comodo chances are malware won't run with OSA. And it's brand new with I suppose even more to come in the future. I hope to get a chance in the near to work with Hard_Configurator and I'll probably be saying the same thing about it... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top