Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
[Windows 7-10] What would be in your opinion the most lightweight yet effective security?
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 713590" data-attributes="member: 32260"><p>It seems that my setup is functionally similar to yours. In my Windows 10 I sometimes use:</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Default-deny + file reputation service: Hard_Configurator</strong> <strong>(with forced SmartScreen)</strong> instead of CF.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Antivirus</strong> + Anti-Exploit + AntiRansomware: <strong>Defender</strong> + Controlled folder access + Exploit Guard, instead of Q360 + AppCheck + EMET</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul"><strong>Shadow Defender </strong>on boot</li> </ul><p>Mostly, I use only the bolded components. SmartScreen is much better for checking installers than Comodo File Lookup.</p><p>I like OSArmor and ReHips very much, but I do not need them with the above setup. In fact, my setup can be reconfigured with a few mouse clicks from locked to almost unrestricted due to Hard_Configurator and ConfigureDefender.</p><p>I also install many programs for testing, and after finishing tests my system is untouched due to Shadow Defender.</p><p>Anyway, for most people the default-deny setup will be inconvenient, because they have habits adjusted to default-allow security like standard Antivirus suites.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 713590, member: 32260"] It seems that my setup is functionally similar to yours. In my Windows 10 I sometimes use: [LIST] [*][B]Default-deny + file reputation service: Hard_Configurator[/B] [B](with forced SmartScreen)[/B] instead of CF. [*][B]Antivirus[/B] + Anti-Exploit + AntiRansomware: [B]Defender[/B] + Controlled folder access + Exploit Guard, instead of Q360 + AppCheck + EMET [*][B]Shadow Defender [/B]on boot [/LIST] Mostly, I use only the bolded components. SmartScreen is much better for checking installers than Comodo File Lookup. I like OSArmor and ReHips very much, but I do not need them with the above setup. In fact, my setup can be reconfigured with a few mouse clicks from locked to almost unrestricted due to Hard_Configurator and ConfigureDefender. I also install many programs for testing, and after finishing tests my system is untouched due to Shadow Defender. Anyway, for most people the default-deny setup will be inconvenient, because they have habits adjusted to default-allow security like standard Antivirus suites. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top