Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Testing
Malware Hub: Statistics and Reports
Windows Defender - June 2019 Report
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 72227" data-source="post: 823644"><p>I guess that's the downfall of how WD is designed and implemented. The HUB testing methodology doesn't allow it to be tested necessarily how MS designed and implemented it. Not making excuses at all, nor am I saying your doing it wrong [USER=51905]@Evjl's Rain[/USER], I just mean that the hub doesn't necessarily test how one uses a computer, ie downloading malware through a browser. This is just a minor flaw in the testing methodology that applies to all products, not just WD. Whether this makes a difference remains to be seen, but it's still a part that is missed. Don't get me wrong, I know it's not done due to complexity and being dangerous, but it's still a flaw.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Again due to the way WD is designed and implemented there will be some gaps. Aside from USB malware, I would hazard to guess that in real world use there may be a different outcome, as it seems like MS designed it to work a certain way. Again not making excuses, just something to think about<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite110" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>[USER=51905]@Evjl's Rain[/USER] I know you want to stop testing WD, but I am wondering if you wanted to test it maxed out with configure defender running along side OSA, or syshardener? I know this isn't testing WD specifically, but rather how a setup may do over all.<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 72227, post: 823644"] I guess that's the downfall of how WD is designed and implemented. The HUB testing methodology doesn't allow it to be tested necessarily how MS designed and implemented it. Not making excuses at all, nor am I saying your doing it wrong [USER=51905]@Evjl's Rain[/USER], I just mean that the hub doesn't necessarily test how one uses a computer, ie downloading malware through a browser. This is just a minor flaw in the testing methodology that applies to all products, not just WD. Whether this makes a difference remains to be seen, but it's still a part that is missed. Don't get me wrong, I know it's not done due to complexity and being dangerous, but it's still a flaw.;) Again due to the way WD is designed and implemented there will be some gaps. Aside from USB malware, I would hazard to guess that in real world use there may be a different outcome, as it seems like MS designed it to work a certain way. Again not making excuses, just something to think about;) [USER=51905]@Evjl's Rain[/USER] I know you want to stop testing WD, but I am wondering if you wanted to test it maxed out with configure defender running along side OSA, or syshardener? I know this isn't testing WD specifically, but rather how a setup may do over all.(y) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top