Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
News
Technology News
YouTube tests ways to stop ad blockers: what to expect
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arequire" data-source="post: 1067364" data-attributes="member: 59283"><p>Probably not, but I'd like to think I wouldn't create an ad blocking company that's potentially dependent on the world's biggest advertising company for it's financial security. That'd be a blatant conflict of interest.</p><p></p><p>Why? It's not eyeo's job to protect YouTube's revenue stream.</p><p></p><p>Look it's cool if you think that there should be some kind of middle ground (I personally have nothing against advertising as a business model, just the baggage that comes with it), but eyeo is being categorically misleading here. They're breaking the agreement they have with their users by refusing to do what they literally advertise they do, then justifying it with moral grandstanding and erroneous claims. There's a reason there's such a furore over YouTube attempting to ban ad blockers: users consider YouTube ads inherently annoying, and I've no doubt eyeo's products will lose users if they continue to capitulate.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arequire, post: 1067364, member: 59283"] Probably not, but I'd like to think I wouldn't create an ad blocking company that's potentially dependent on the world's biggest advertising company for it's financial security. That'd be a blatant conflict of interest. Why? It's not eyeo's job to protect YouTube's revenue stream. Look it's cool if you think that there should be some kind of middle ground (I personally have nothing against advertising as a business model, just the baggage that comes with it), but eyeo is being categorically misleading here. They're breaking the agreement they have with their users by refusing to do what they literally advertise they do, then justifying it with moral grandstanding and erroneous claims. There's a reason there's such a furore over YouTube attempting to ban ad blockers: users consider YouTube ads inherently annoying, and I've no doubt eyeo's products will lose users if they continue to capitulate. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top