Battle Zemana Anti-Malware vs SecureAPlus (Premium)

[DJ Panda]

I believe both products are good. If you can't decided either just choose both.

 

[Tinytime23]

I used SecureAPlus for around a week, and it was just constanly doing a universal scan. Im not exaggerating, it was constantly doing scans. This caused me major slowdowns. For this reason I chose Zemana.

 

[LabZero]

I choose Zemana.
No doubt about the detection rate but SecureAPlus takes about 3 hours for a full scan of my system.

 

[frogboy]

I pick Zemana, great detection rate, fast scans and getting less FP"s all the time.

 

[jerzy601]

I choose Zemana risk because it has a good detection rate is lightweight and easy to use and besides a quick scan.

 

[Rishi]

Zemana AM for it's lightweight qualities, SAP relies more on whitelisting objects and initial scan can take a few hours. However for offline protection SAP's lockdown mode can be useful.You can also choose the engines but ZAM does the job effectively too on less memory.

 

[enaph]

Lightning fast scans, cloud based, no performance impact etc. - my love goes to Zemana

 

[Kalashnikov]

I Prefer Zemana Anti-Malware.SecureAPlus,according to me it is paranoid

 

[kev216]

Zemana for me. It is featherlight, scans very fast and has a great detection ratio. The only downside are the FP's, but compared to some time ago, it seems that they are gradually working on this, which is nice. Overall a great product to have.

 

[Noxx]

Zemana for all the reasons described. Lighter, WAY faster scans, and amazing (maybe even the best) cloud signatures.

 

[jamescv7]

I will go base on the stability and performance when the system was installed.

Zemana AM has an edge compare to SecureAplus on the usage however excluding on that factor; then its SecureAplus because of Whitelisting technology.