Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Other security for Windows, Mac, Linux
Zero Trust (Solution Vote)
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 97327" data-source="post: 1016281"><p>Seems Andrezj has got DanB started. Best response is ([USER=62850]@danb[/USER]), don't counter attack, just stick to factual info. When you go along with the nitty gritty "who said what" you are losing the audience (because we see two people in a heated emotional discussion). As a supplier it is hard when your product is put in a negative context with information whih is twisted to support the accusers cause, but in a PR and Marketing context it is better to stay away from reacting in detail </p><p></p><p>The post you provided with someone using MT-nicknames to attack you already convinced me (that your product is accused out of context). Keep on pointing to that bogus MT-nicknames on another website/social network. Randomly ask a MT-member whose nickname was used to publish bogis complaints whether they were the ones complaining or that someone else impersonated them. Their confirmation (it was not me posting that bogus review/complaint) is stronger than any emotional response by you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 97327, post: 1016281"] Seems Andrezj has got DanB started. Best response is ([USER=62850]@danb[/USER]), don't counter attack, just stick to factual info. When you go along with the nitty gritty "who said what" you are losing the audience (because we see two people in a heated emotional discussion). As a supplier it is hard when your product is put in a negative context with information whih is twisted to support the accusers cause, but in a PR and Marketing context it is better to stay away from reacting in detail The post you provided with someone using MT-nicknames to attack you already convinced me (that your product is accused out of context). Keep on pointing to that bogus MT-nicknames on another website/social network. Randomly ask a MT-member whose nickname was used to publish bogis complaints whether they were the ones complaining or that someone else impersonated them. Their confirmation (it was not me posting that bogus review/complaint) is stronger than any emotional response by you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top