Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Andy Ful" data-source="post: 930728" data-attributes="member: 32260">Look carefully at the first table (Usability = false positives).<img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up&nbsp; &nbsp; (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" />A few million legitimate samples were tested during a system scan. Bitdefender has got 28 false positives (Industry average was 25) and Norton only 1, Kaspersky 2, Microsoft Defender 2, Eset 4, etc.These false positives are related to offline signatures (not to dynamic detections). That is why there are differences between AV-Test and AV-Comparatives false positives tests. But in the case of Bitdefender, the number of false positives (offline signatures) in the AV-Test is significantly higher than in AV-Comparatives (offline detections selected).</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Andy Ful, post: 930728, member: 32260"] Look carefully at the first table (Usability = false positives).:)(y) A few million legitimate samples were tested during a system scan. Bitdefender has got 28 false positives (Industry average was 25) and Norton only 1, Kaspersky 2, Microsoft Defender 2, Eset 4, etc. These false positives are related to offline signatures (not to dynamic detections). That is why there are differences between AV-Test and AV-Comparatives false positives tests. But in the case of Bitdefender, the number of false positives (offline signatures) in the AV-Test is significantly higher than in AV-Comparatives (offline detections selected). [/QUOTE]

Verification