- Mar 1, 2014
- 1,708
Not really on-topic, Garry Kasparov (in the picture of the first post), one of the greatest Chess Grandmasters of all time, has been working with Avast as its ambassador. 
2029: the year when robots will have the power to outsmart their makers
- Thread starter Venustus
- Start date
He is a great example of human intelligence, I don't remember well but I believe he has won some chess game against Deep Blue, amazingNot really on-topic, Garry Kasparov (in the picture of the first post), one of the greatest Chess Grandmasters of all time, has been working with Avast as its ambassador.
- Jul 6, 2017
- 2,392
in chess, machines are difficult. to beat them. A teacher said that in order to win a machine, pieces had to be given. and then the machine went down in level. and so it was possible to beat him
I'm not a robot.
I can beat any machine for chess. All I have to do is simply unplug the machine, now I win. Hahaha. Winner!
+1I'm not a robot.
I can beat any machine for chess. All I have to do is simply unplug the machine, now I win. Hahaha. Winner!
- May 3, 2015
- 1,760
Exactly. Just let the AI run with hardware restrictions..
- Jan 7, 2016
- 311
They need to make a fail safe with these machines! Like a logic meltdown, something as simple as: what has a tongue but no mouth? Which in turn would cause the robot to malfunction and shut down...
You could always just make a normal kill-switch through a button on the machine which will power down. Or a special device which sends a signals to it -> activates the shutdown.
thing is if they are connected to a network then they can be hacked remotely too. so then an attacker could hijack it to do something bad for them :/ (or do it manually if no network to intercept!)
- Apr 5, 2017
- 836
answer? you ! the robot grab you and rip away your tongue, failsafe down, you dead, Terminator win !
- Aug 31, 2014
- 655
Short article on Asimov's 3 Laws of Robotics
How do you stop a robot from hurting people? Many existing robots, such as those assembling cars in factories, shut down immediately when a human comes near. But this quick fix wouldn’t work for something like a self-driving car that might have to move to avoid a collision, or a care robot that might need to catch an old person if they fall. With robots set to become our servants, companions and co-workers, we need to deal with the increasingly complex situations this will create and the ethical and safety questions this will raise.
Asimov's Laws Won't Stop Robots from Harming Humans, So We've Developed a Better Solution
How do you stop a robot from hurting people? Many existing robots, such as those assembling cars in factories, shut down immediately when a human comes near. But this quick fix wouldn’t work for something like a self-driving car that might have to move to avoid a collision, or a care robot that might need to catch an old person if they fall. With robots set to become our servants, companions and co-workers, we need to deal with the increasingly complex situations this will create and the ethical and safety questions this will raise.
Asimov's Laws Won't Stop Robots from Harming Humans, So We've Developed a Better Solution
- May 3, 2015
- 1,760
The three laws are not perfect... even Asimov said so in his stories. For instance how do you make a surgeon robot that follows the three laws? He can't harm a human being so he can't perform surgery. If he tries to perform surgery he needs to harm a human being, if he doesn't he's harming a human being by not acting... a robot surgeon that follows the three laws would probably melt its positronic brain within minutes of first being activated
Last edited:
- Aug 30, 2017
- 101
Is it just my warped mind, or do I see a common thread here?
It seems to me that we're simply describing an existing AI... Humanity. Don't worry about the Rise of the Machines, We're already here
It seems to me that we're simply describing an existing AI... Humanity. Don't worry about the Rise of the Machines, We're already here
- Nov 19, 2014
- 2,350
Good luck predicting a new technology's development 12 years in the future. Sure buddy i am sure you will get it.
Google branded robots with TV screens for faces following us around 24/7 serving targeted ads. I can see it now.
I guess it'd be more like Yandex branded robots in your case.
- Aug 30, 2017
- 101
But OTOH, has anybody read The Humanoids (1948) and The Humanoid Touch (1980) by Jack Williamson? Basically, we could wind up with an AI which sees us as seriously stupidly under-educated and in need of remedial care rather than extermination...
- Oct 11, 2014
- 112
Hahaha 100 years ago flying cars with cardboard wings are expected.
I also do not understand the desire to make computers think like us.
1- why the computers would come to reason or be aware of if ...
2- Evolution as well as artificial intelligence are based on positive stimuli .. And for this to work to fail (something unacceptable for a machine)
3- The evolution is based on aleoteridad therefore has a sea of possibilities. The aleoteridad is not something useful for a machine.
Maybe in 1000 computers invade us not in 10 years.
I also do not understand the desire to make computers think like us.
1- why the computers would come to reason or be aware of if ...
2- Evolution as well as artificial intelligence are based on positive stimuli .. And for this to work to fail (something unacceptable for a machine)
3- The evolution is based on aleoteridad therefore has a sea of possibilities. The aleoteridad is not something useful for a machine.
Maybe in 1000 computers invade us not in 10 years.
- Jan 7, 2016
- 311
answer? you ! the robot grab you and rip away your tongue, failsafe down, you dead, Terminator win !
- Aug 17, 2017
- 1,609
Here's another one, just so exceptional and brilliant, literally, gives a wondering person hope, thank you tim one.
Similar threads
