Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="nicolaasjan" data-source="post: 1064348" data-attributes="member: 101172">I presume it didn&#039;t work for me, because I tested the list/script combination on the Pale Moon browser (doesn&#039;t support web extensions).And the <a href="https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock-for-firefox-legacy" target="_blank">legacy uBO version</a> on that browser obviously can&#039;t parse filters with newer syntax...In this case, this filter was not recognized:[ICODE]bloomberg.com##+js(set-local-storage-item, history, $remove$)[/ICODE]On Firefox only the filter list indeed works. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite109" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />Sorry for the confusion.From now on I&#039;ll be doing A/B testing on the same browser.That said, I prefer the extension, because there must be other sites where only the list won&#039;t be sufficient.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="nicolaasjan, post: 1064348, member: 101172"] I presume it didn't work for me, because I tested the list/script combination on the Pale Moon browser (doesn't support web extensions). And the [URL='https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock-for-firefox-legacy']legacy uBO version[/URL] on that browser obviously can't parse filters with newer syntax... In this case, this filter was not recognized: [ICODE]bloomberg.com##+js(set-local-storage-item, history, $remove$)[/ICODE] On Firefox only the filter list indeed works. :) Sorry for the confusion. From now on I'll be doing A/B testing on the same browser. That said, I prefer the extension, because there must be other sites where only the list won't be sufficient. [/QUOTE]

Verification