Battle 360 Internet Security vs Eset Smart Security 7

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sort by date Sort by votes
Both are complete. But I'd give the upper hand to ESET Smart Security 7.
Currently using it. Changed from Norton Internet Security to Eset Smart Security 7 today :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: adyblueboy
Upvote 0 Downvote
Not to mention being free or paid I choose with my eyes closed Eset, which for me is the suite of the market that has better detection of malware and Pups, has a quiet ram intake, since it does not bring any impact on your system , super lightweight. Eset is more complete and more polished. 360is in my view is the best free antivirus market, excelent signatures (bitdefender + Cloud QVM), a lightweight TBM, a good proactive security and firewall will in the future. If you are willing to test or pay a eset suite. If you can not use Comodo Firewall + 360 Is My opinion # :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Venustus and adyblueboy
Upvote 0 Downvote
venustus said:
Dont get me wrong Qihoo is a great product, but I guess I'm just used to Eset having used it for many many years.:)
Click to expand...
I know i also tried ESET for some months, everything was fine but i didn't like it 0 day protection, then i watched review of qihoo 360 version 4.8 & saw they improved there 0 day protection which impressed me. Before I was always confused how qihoo 0 day protection will work against malware. Sure ESET gets a bit high detection rate then qihoo in on-demand scan but i believe in prevention. Qihoo did a lot better & stills new, i bet it will do far better then other security products. Also qihoo is lighter then ESET in my system . thnx :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Venustus
Upvote 0 Downvote
Agreed that Eset doesn't have the best zero day protection, and it's hips could be improved in terms of having some type of default rules,already set.In other words it's hips in default mode doesn't really do much.If you set it's hips to policy based mode it is a great deal stronger
Then again I dont use it's hips, relying on Comodo to cover that aspect of my security,so Eset fills my needs very well.
It's web filter is very good,and is as light as a feather on my machine!
(For zero day F-Secure/Kaspersky are very very good)

No doubt Qihoo will improve in time to be one of the best products (and free)!!


Cheers!:)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Koroke San
Upvote 0 Downvote
Yup but since i use CF, i don't need to worry about HIPS. Qihoo also own good webfilter. Best thing it's free & u don't need to pay any single penny since many AV users are Freebies :D & gives as same level protection as top branded AV. CF + ESET was a bit heavy in my machine so i removed ESET. And for 0 day u forget EAM in ur list ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kent and Venustus
Upvote 0 Downvote
Koroke San said:
Yup but since i use CF, i don't need to worry about HIPS. Qihoo also own good webfilter. Best thing it's free & u don't need to pay any single penny since many AV users are Freebies :D & gives as same level protection as top branded AV. CF + ESET was a bit heavy in my machine so i removed ESET. And for 0 day u forget EAM in ur list ;)
Click to expand...
Of course!
I forgot about Emsisoft:D

Qihoo's webfilter does not work for me on Chrome.
I don't know why?
Can you elaborate?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Koroke San
Upvote 0 Downvote
venustus said:
Of course!

Qihoo's webfilter does not work for me on Chrome.
I don't know why?
Can you elaborate?
Click to expand...

How? hmm. i can see " 360 WebShield Plug-in" in my chrome extension list but i didn't loaded in firefox addons list. and Qihoo did blocked some phishing sites before when i didn't use k9, Panda URl filter etc. But since i didn't trust qihoo webfilter fully, i use k9, panda url filter , norton dns, didn't slowed down my surfing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Venustus
Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.

You may also like...