360 Internet Security vs Eset Smart Security 7
- Thread starter adyblueboy
- Start date
- Status
Yeah, I have the plugin too,but it has never blocked a malicious site when using Chrome!
It does catch the file on download however!
It does catch the file on download however!
Yea, maybe u r right, that's why i told u before i don't trust any single security product.Try panda url filter with it.I like it download protection & registry protection
Ok I might try that!Yea, maybe u r right, that's why i told u before i don't trust any single security product.Try panda url filter with it.I like it download protection & registry protection
Thanks.
outbreaks humble opinion is better Eset Internet Security light is not confrontational and does not consume a lot of memory just use it now and I'm happy with it, and as for programs of Chinese do not trust, that is my opinion.
and as for programs of Chinese do not trust, that is my opinion.
for what basis u say " do not trust Chinese programs? " can u explain, bro? thnx
are not tuned to the evil opinions of Internet users may be popular in the Asian part of Europe but is not enough, few, most often they are counterfeit of originals and always with a hidden virus, moreover, like all products, china have bad opinions.No offense but that is an opinion.
are not tuned to the evil opinions of Internet users may be popular in the Asian part of Europe but is not enough, few, most often they are counterfeit of originals and always with a hidden virus, moreover, like all products, china have bad opinions.No offense but that is an opinion.
Is that ur opinion why u not use chiense AV or products,i can understand. what If i say all NSA is behind all AV made in USA & AV sell user information to NSA or other private agency? How i can trust other AV Privacy policy? How if i say different Antivirus from worldwide controlling by their own country governments? Personally I don't trust any AV judging them by their country. First I watch reviews of AV & if it looks promising then i search about it in different forums & also in Google. watch it's user reviews & then i read it's privacy policy & if still doubt i contact their AV vendor.It's not proved 100% that qihoo sell user's information, so now it's safe to use it. thnx
All of that and everything means protections in everyday use.I think eset is to 10% up on qihoo 360 for windows 8.1.
ESS 7. It is the most complete for my system on Win 8.1. It works best for me
I would go with Eset i have used it for awhile and it has never did me wrong.
When is comes to Zero-Day Protection both ESET & Qihoo are awesome, but since ESET has a lot more features than Qihoo & lighter than Qihoo, I will go for ESET.
ESET's Zero-Day Protection relies on its signatures,
ESET Signature is so-called DNA-based generic signatures, which are rather complex definitions of malicious behavior and malware characteristics. These generic signatures also rely on heuristics and emulation to evaluate the scanned sample.
In the generic signatures lies the strength of ESET’s proactive detection. This means that the detection is effective, as well as efficient – a single well-crafted generic signature can detect thousands of related malware variants and that our antivirus software can detect not only malware that we know of, or have seen before, but also new, previously unknown variants
Most of the AV have Behavior Blocker to detect malicious behavior whereas in ESET if you enable Potentially Unwanted Application & Potentially Unsafe Application that will be able to detect most of the malwares, ESET signature is itself works better than any Behavior Blocker.
The 3 New Features introduced in ESET Smart Security 7 are good features but they still need a lot of work.
HIPS really doesn't exist for a normal user, HIPS are made for the users who use to say that ESET's Zero-Day Protection is not good, so just Configure it how you want & it will provide the best zero day protection.
I am really not good at testing firewall but i do love Interactive Mode of Firewall which is really very awesome.
ESET Signature is so-called DNA-based generic signatures, which are rather complex definitions of malicious behavior and malware characteristics. These generic signatures also rely on heuristics and emulation to evaluate the scanned sample.
In the generic signatures lies the strength of ESET’s proactive detection. This means that the detection is effective, as well as efficient – a single well-crafted generic signature can detect thousands of related malware variants and that our antivirus software can detect not only malware that we know of, or have seen before, but also new, previously unknown variants
Most of the AV have Behavior Blocker to detect malicious behavior whereas in ESET if you enable Potentially Unwanted Application & Potentially Unsafe Application that will be able to detect most of the malwares, ESET signature is itself works better than any Behavior Blocker.
The 3 New Features introduced in ESET Smart Security 7 are good features but they still need a lot of work.
HIPS really doesn't exist for a normal user, HIPS are made for the users who use to say that ESET's Zero-Day Protection is not good, so just Configure it how you want & it will provide the best zero day protection.
I am really not good at testing firewall but i do love Interactive Mode of Firewall which is really very awesome.
Last edited:
Yup but since i use CF, i don't need to worry about HIPS. Qihoo also own good webfilter. Best thing it's free & u don't need to pay any single penny since many AV users are Freebies
Can you please post screenshot of 360 Web Protection in action ex-malicious site blocked...........
- Status
You may also like...
-
Battle: Bitdefender Total Security Antivirus vs ESET Smart Security Antivirus | 2025- Started by NB InfoTech
- Replies: 4
-
The Trifecta Threat. Comodo vs. ESET vs. McAfee - Which Security Suite Wears the Crown?- Started by Divergent
- Replies: 31
-
-
Battle: Bitdefender Free Antivirus vs 360 Total Security Free Antivirus | Test and Review | 2025
- Started by NB InfoTech
- Replies: 2
-
