- Jun 26, 2014
- 24
So, in my previous thread, MT seemed to prefer avast over comodo, so I decided to compare it to another program, 360 total security. As always, post why you prefer one over the other.
Yes, I agree that avast! is lighter.i switched from 360TS to avast, 360 is far too heavy on system recourses i was surprised just how light avast is now its like a feather.
I also found ondemand scanning to start up very slow on 360
At the momment im really happy with Avast and comodo firewall
What kind of (noticeable) problems/bugs does 360 TS have currently (latest version)?
ZoneAlarm Firewall + Antivirus (no standalone version). But it is not the same as having Kaspersky (less frequent updates, older engine, etc).Just off topic but are there any free antivirus out there which use the kasperskey engine?.
Just off topic but are there any free antivirus out there which use the kasperskey engine?.
I am not having this problem. Quick scan is about 1 minute on my Win 7 pc. Are you running Win 8 by chance?i switched from 360TS to avast, 360 is far too heavy on system recourses i was surprised just how light avast is now its like a feather.
I also found ondemand scanning to start up very slow on 360
At the momment im really happy with Avast and comodo firewall
Don't use qihoo TS windows updater coz it was showing me a few updates still remain to done after i install window update from it's default updater. Then i check manually those updates in Microsoft site, what i found 1-2 update which TS was showing are only supported for for XP , for my window 8.1 64 bit & rest 2 update i downloaded, 1 was only support for 32 bit & left one update successfully by me manually. So 360 TS windows updater can't detect sometime which update is for wut OS & for wut architecture.So far none with the AV engine it self, it's pretty good actually and the cloud engine is powerful, but I noticed a bug with the "Patch" feature on it, it will detected any vulnerabilities on windows that windows missed? I'm not sure since my windows is up to dated (not the optional one) but 360 TS say I need to patch these missing updates, when I updated it, my windows saying that I never update my windows, however after I re-scan it..it's back to normal and windows told me that my OS is up to dated. I'm not sure whether it's a bug on 360 TS or windows was lying to me (although so far no problem)
But I'm not gonna talk about this since this thread is about "Vs and Vs"
There is another thread that talking about this Patch feature
If you scanned normally would things be detected? or is it some issue with avastI used Avast Bootscan & nothing was ever detected..!
I used Avast Bootscan & nothing was ever detected..!
Do you consider avast to be more buggy that 360 total/internet security??360 TS
Pros:
- Detection rate
- Behavior Blocker
- Better clean up
Cons:
- WebFilter
- Not yet ''finalized'' like 360 Internet Security.
- Late Updates
- High memory usage in some cases
AVAST
Pros:
- Webfilter
- Hardened Mode and Evogen
- Light on memory
Cons:
- Not so light when user is multitasking, after some time Avast become a little bit ''heavy'' on system response
- DeepScan (always allow) ...they definitely need to fix that
- Average detection rate, it reacts more after execution of the file.
- Buggy.........(just visit avast facebook page or their forum,to read what people say) Latest bugs according to users was IE plugin, and grimefighter
- Not good at clean up
- Their support team (according to users i read in facebook) suck.
This is my personal opinion, as i have tried both programs couple of months ago
Personally i wouldn't use TS or Avast, but i would definitely choose 360 Internet Security.
The choice depends on the user.
It really surprises me that every time any AV product does better on malware sample tests that it is automatically considered to be the best and all other factors are ignored.
Do you consider avast to be more buggy that 360 total/internet security??
Your experience about Avast is interesting! Thanks for the info! I also find 360 very light if avira & bitdefender engines are not enabled.I am not sure φίλε Niko about Total Security but Avast is definitely not as stable as 360 Internet Security.
Total security is still under development while Internet Security is a finalized product.
As about Avast, i describe what i read + my personal opinion as i have used avast couple of months ago.
Avast is not so stable as 360 INTERNET SECURITY.
Avast is very light in the beginning, but after some weeks it will become more ''heavy'' on system response (i use music and media software and i multitasking a lot).
Qihoo IS on the other hand is very light on system resources,and i didn't experienced any slowdown even when i open/close,programs & multitasking.
For a product to be ''light'' in memory doesn't mean that the program will be also ''light'' on system response.
Qihoo 360 INTERNET SECURITY is the perfect balance, of memory usage,system response,detection,stability.
If you like my personal opinion Qihoo INTERNET SECURITY is the best free (and not only) AV on the market today.
And i repeat that it is only my personal opinion, and my personal experience i had with these software and my machine.
Άντε και με την Νίκη σήμερα τα βράδυ....