Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Inactive Support Threads
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Security
General Security Discussions
7 NGAV(ML Based) detection rates comparison
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ShenguiTurmi" data-source="post: 1047520" data-attributes="member: 99409"><p>This test uses 30 samples of various types to compare the machine learning detection rates of seven of the better known NGAVs</p><p>Sample source: CrowdStrike Threat Intelligence</p><p>Notes:</p><p>1. Since the source of the samples is CrowdStrike, the results of CrowdStrike are not counted in this test.</p><p>2. Since most of the samples are in the wild and the sample files are not available, only the results from VirusTotal are counted in this test, and there may be differences between the results and the commercial versions of the corresponding software.</p><p>3. In order to exclude some of the NGAV cloud blacklisting (e.g. DeepInstinct and Cylance), only samples that were scanned once by VirusTotal were included in this test.</p><p>4. As the hacker group information corresponding to the sample is a copyrighted asset of CrowdStrike, I will only include the family name of the sample, not the name of the hacker group and the target of the attack.</p><p></p><p>Result:</p><p>[ATTACH=full]276752[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Original text:</p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://ln5.sync.com/dl/e411626a0/ujdctpan-nsnwdmgn-szffwwjr-z6tzj66g[/URL]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ShenguiTurmi, post: 1047520, member: 99409"] This test uses 30 samples of various types to compare the machine learning detection rates of seven of the better known NGAVs Sample source: CrowdStrike Threat Intelligence Notes: 1. Since the source of the samples is CrowdStrike, the results of CrowdStrike are not counted in this test. 2. Since most of the samples are in the wild and the sample files are not available, only the results from VirusTotal are counted in this test, and there may be differences between the results and the commercial versions of the corresponding software. 3. In order to exclude some of the NGAV cloud blacklisting (e.g. DeepInstinct and Cylance), only samples that were scanned once by VirusTotal were included in this test. 4. As the hacker group information corresponding to the sample is a copyrighted asset of CrowdStrike, I will only include the family name of the sample, not the name of the hacker group and the target of the attack. Result: [ATTACH type="full"]276752[/ATTACH] Original text: [URL unfurl="true"]https://ln5.sync.com/dl/e411626a0/ujdctpan-nsnwdmgn-szffwwjr-z6tzj66g[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top