- Mar 22, 2017
- 587
The payloads were most probably blocked because they were not whitelisted. This is the standard default\deny behavior of a firewall, not an AV.
Adaptive Defence 360
- Thread starter owk688
- Start date
Please provide comments and solutions that are helpful to the author of this topic.
- Status
The payloads were most probably blocked because they were not whitelisted. This is the standard default\deny behavior of a firewall, not an AV.
- Mar 19, 2017
- 69
So take an anti-executable it will do the same job
- Mar 22, 2017
- 587
- Mar 22, 2017
- 587
I am using Panda Adaptive Defense in my laptop...I am the System Admin for my company and proposed Panda Adaptive Defense to my company. We are maintaing more that 900 computers. 300 is with Panda Adaptive Defense, another 600+ machine with Kaspersky will be expiring next year..also will be replaced by Panda AD360. I can say that, I have never felt so confident of any Antivirus except Panda Adaptive Defense...after so many research and POC with many endpoint protection...I have tried so many viruses and malwares in my own laptop from hybrid-analysis.com and none of the samples manage to get away from Panda Adaptive Defense 360 radar. If you understand how the security models works in Panda Adaptive Defense....you will be daring like me to download and test virtually any malware from hybrid-analysis.com. You can test any zero day malware from that website. I assure you, I have tested so many malware...docs, pdf, exe, js,..you name it....all blocked, analyzed, captured, quarantined, deleted...everyday I will check and test in my laptop and ready to suicide...but until today...my machine are still safe and secure. You can test fileless attack files...you can test any flash with malware website... hybrid-analysis.com do have URL listing with malware infection...give it a try and be crazy like me.
Oh..I even tested Petya - harddrive ransomware, Cerberus, Locky....all dead end for the zero-day ransomware and malware that will use fileless attack method.
Your reaction to the firewall is nevertheless... priceless
- Mar 19, 2017
- 69
[QUOTE = "sunshineboy, post: 612703, member: 60454"] http://www.av-comparatives.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/avc_sp_pandaad360_2016_en.pdf
Jetez un oeil! [/ QUOTE]
Bonjour, je pense à la commercialisation pure, quand le résultat du test malwares et pua fantaisiste de mon point de vue
Jetez un oeil! [/ QUOTE]
Bonjour, je pense à la commercialisation pure, quand le résultat du test malwares et pua fantaisiste de mon point de vue
- Mar 22, 2017
- 587
Your browser probably translates all the discussions around here, but we do not speak french and this is an English speaking forum
- Mar 19, 2017
- 69
[QUOTE = "Amelith Nargothrond, post: 612711, member: 60405"] Votre navigateur traduit probablement toutes les discussions ici, mais nous ne parlons pas français et c'est un forum parlant anglais ......[/ QUOTE]
Ok je prends bonne note
Ok je prends bonne note
- Mar 19, 2017
- 69
Défense 360 est un anti exe + droit de nuages?
Comme vs + nuage! Rien de plus? [/ QUOTE]
It looks strangely like
Comme vs + nuage! Rien de plus? [/ QUOTE]
It looks strangely like
- Mar 22, 2017
- 587
- Mar 22, 2017
- 587
More like an AV with a default\deny firewall, heavily based on the firewall part.
- Mar 22, 2017
- 587
They call it adaptive, as probably it will whitelist the most common apps you use in a certain period of time when it's not blocking anything (it's what they call "the learning period"), and deny/block everything else afterwards.
- Mar 22, 2017
- 587
Aaaaaaaaaaaand, because it's so much fun replying to this (please don't be offended), this super next gen av probably would have blocked any executable, even one from the ice age, if it's not in the whitelist. Basically it's completely irrelevant if it's a 0 day or an ancient egyptian day malware
- Mar 11, 2017
- 132
Well, you have blacklist by traditional AV, and you have whitelist and greylist to complete the protection, then you have behaviour protection. That makes a basic next gen AV. Hope you're not offended by my explanation. Yes it's fun. Hehehe
- Mar 11, 2017
- 132
Exactly, except the whitelisting is handled by Panda Cloud.Aaaaaaaaaaaand, because it's so much fun replying to this (please don't be offended), this super next gen av probably would have blocked any executable, even one from the ice age, if it's not in the whitelist. Basically it's completely irrelevant if it's a 0 day or an ancient egyptian day malware
Three questions if I use it on my laptop
1) Is Panda AV strong enough as compared to Kaspersky, BD, Avast etc
2) If offline how can it protect my system? If cannot then I'll need another set of of AV?
3) Is this software totally cloud-based?
Thanks
1) Is Panda AV strong enough as compared to Kaspersky, BD, Avast etc
2) If offline how can it protect my system? If cannot then I'll need another set of of AV?
3) Is this software totally cloud-based?
Thanks
Last edited:
- Aug 2, 2015
- 4,286
No shortcut, the rules apply to all, and they are there for a reason
- Aug 2, 2015
- 4,286
Post in English here or the mods will get you
- Mar 11, 2017
- 132
You do realise that this next gen av blocked it because the executable was not whitelisted (permitted to run/execute), right? And not because it was detected as malware...
Yes, this feature is needed to help our non IT savvy users from accidentally download and run email attachment... While some maybe safe to open as classified by Panda.
Last edited:
- Mar 11, 2017
- 132
Guess it will be easy for me to reach 100 post this way and gain access to the so called fresh malware. Hehe
- Status
Similar threads
