Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
General Apps
AdGuard
AdGuard Manifest V3 Extension v0.3.12
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ForgottenSeer 97327" data-source="post: 1011124"><p>[USER=94377]@Virtuoso[/USER] </p><p></p><p>I think it is in general a good idea to offer different levels of filtering. You can either choose to run complete mode and drop back to optimal mode for websites when it breaks website functionality (advanced user) or run it in optimal mode and increase filtering for nasty websites (informed user). The beauty of this flexibility is that you can use what fits you best. So well done Mr. Gorhill <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite130" alt="(y)" title="Thumbs up (y)" loading="lazy" data-shortname="(y)" /></p><p></p><p>I would like Microsoft to adopt this idea of offering diefferent filtering levels per website for their anti-tracking also. Advanced users could run it in STRICT and fallback to BALANCED when they run into problems. It is much smarter than a ON-OFF switch alone. CNN for instance would not play videos, when Edge was set to STRICT in the past (it is no problem anymore). They only thing I could do with just one filtering level is to use the feedback button and switch of Edge build-in anti-tracking for CNN. Providing an option to fallback to a less aggressive level of filtering is a much more sophisticated solution IMO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ForgottenSeer 97327, post: 1011124"] [USER=94377]@Virtuoso[/USER] I think it is in general a good idea to offer different levels of filtering. You can either choose to run complete mode and drop back to optimal mode for websites when it breaks website functionality (advanced user) or run it in optimal mode and increase filtering for nasty websites (informed user). The beauty of this flexibility is that you can use what fits you best. So well done Mr. Gorhill (y) I would like Microsoft to adopt this idea of offering diefferent filtering levels per website for their anti-tracking also. Advanced users could run it in STRICT and fallback to BALANCED when they run into problems. It is much smarter than a ON-OFF switch alone. CNN for instance would not play videos, when Edge was set to STRICT in the past (it is no problem anymore). They only thing I could do with just one filtering level is to use the feedback button and switch of Edge build-in anti-tracking for CNN. Providing an option to fallback to a less aggressive level of filtering is a much more sophisticated solution IMO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top