Technology Amazon makes its AI-powered Alexa+ free on Fire TV, no Prime required

Brownie2019

Level 23
Thread author
Verified
Well-known
Forum Veteran
Mar 9, 2019
1,061
5,852
2,168
Germany
AI is coming to your TV, whether you want it or not.

On Wednesday, Amazon said its AI assistant, Alexa+, will be rolled out to all compatible Fire TV devices in the U.S. for free, whether or not the customer has a Prime subscription. The update brings conversational search, smart home controls, and AI-powered recommendations, the company says.

Previously, Alexa+ cost $19.99 per month for anyone who didn’t have an Amazon Prime membership, and was initially made available to the new Fire TV devices the company announced last fall.

Now, Amazon says that everyone will be upgraded to Alexa+ automatically. They won’t need to download an app or sign up for a subscription. Compatible devices include all the current-generation Amazon Fire TV Sticks, the Fire TV Cube, Amazon Ember smart TVs, and other smart TVs that have Alexa+ built in, including Hisense and Panasonic.

The move follows an industry-wide push to make AI services available on more consumer electronic devices, often through non-optional upgrades like this. Google, for instance, rolled out Gemini to its Google TV platform earlier this year, replacing simple search features with AI-powered conversational modes. Roku upgraded its voice assistant to AI last year, too.

The companies point to metrics like time spent with the features to suggest positive consumer adoption trends. For instance, Amazon says that Alexa+ customers now have nearly twice as many conversations on Fire TV as they did with the original Alexa, which apparently suggests that customers with Alexa+ are no longer using their TV only as a lean-back source of entertainment, and are instead engaging with the AI, too.

Whether or not that’s a good thing is debatable.

Amazon says that with Alexa+, users don’t have to ask for shows by title, but can instead ask for suggestions based on other factors such as theme, age or popularity — for example, “a top-rated thriller” or “a historical drama with a strong female lead.”

The AI bot can also help customers manage and control their smart home, including displaying their Ring camera feeds on the TV.
 
Privacy and Security Considerations

The convenience may be useful, but an automatic AI upgrade on a television deserves careful review. A TV with a microphone, voice assistant, viewing history, and smart-home access can expose more information than a traditional streaming device.

Important points include:

  • Review Alexa’s microphone, voice-recording, personalization, and advertising settings after the update.
  • Check whether voice recordings are stored, how long they are retained, and whether they can be deleted.
  • Use a strong, unique Amazon password and enable multifactor authentication.
  • Protect Ring and other camera devices with separate strong credentials and multifactor authentication.
  • Avoid displaying sensitive camera feeds or private notifications where visitors or other household members may see them.
  • Install updates only through the TV’s normal system-update mechanism, not through links or pop-ups.
  • If the feature is unwanted, disable voice control or disconnect the TV from the network where practical. The exact options depend on the device and software version.

AI recommendations and conversational search can also produce incorrect or unsuitable results. They should not be treated as authoritative, especially for medical, financial, security, or emergency information.

The main concern is not simply that the assistant is “AI,” but that it combines cloud processing with access to personal viewing data and potentially cameras, locks, lights, and other devices. Users should review the permissions and privacy controls rather than assuming the default configuration is appropriate.
 
Ive had emails asking if I wanted early use to it, I'm in UK though, I don't use Alexa but seems it there whether I want it or not, interesting how its free, I doubt it will remain that way, either way I wont use it though I expect the masses will have it running everything they can think of, maybe when they can't manage without it as entire home controlled by it they will charge, its happened with everything else so??
 
Ive had emails asking if I wanted early use to it, I'm in UK though, I don't use Alexa but seems it there whether I want it or not, interesting how its free, I doubt it will remain that way, either way I wont use it though I expect the masses will have it running everything they can think of, maybe when they can't manage without it as entire home controlled by it they will charge, its happened with everything else so??
It is highly unlikely that Amazon will reinstate a subscription fee for this service. While a fee might be introduced alongside significant new features, historical precedent suggests otherwise. Since Alexa's launch in the 2010s, the business model has primarily tied monetization to hardware purchases rather than ongoing software subscriptions. Although Amazon did pilot a paid tier for Alexa+ over several months, reversing from a paid model back to a free tier and then attempting to monetize it again is a rare strategy, particularly for an enterprise of Amazon's scale. Transitioning from a free service to a paid one is common, but fluctuating back and forth is structurally disruptive.

Presently, major tech firms have heavily invested in AI data centers and face intense pressure to justify these capital expenditures to investors. However, the rollout and execution of the Alexa+ update have been slow and underwhelming. In its current state, the assistant's performance is noticeably inferior to competing market alternatives. A critical technical issue is its input handling: Alexa+ frequently truncates user input mid-sentence, leading to incomplete queries and inadequate responses. This suggests a systemic issue with its voice-activation timeout thresholds or token allocation limits.
 
I liked Google Home better, I had both. GH was smarter than Alexa and could answer many questions, probably due to the fact that Google is a search engine.. Alexa can read Wikipedia, while GH 3-4 line short answers.
 
Last edited: