Forums
New posts
Search forums
News
Security News
Technology News
Giveaways
Giveaways, Promotions and Contests
Discounts & Deals
Reviews
Users Reviews
Video Reviews
Support
Windows Malware Removal Help & Support
Mac Malware Removal Help & Support
Mobile Malware Removal Help & Support
Blog
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Reply to thread
Menu
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
Software
Security Apps
Other security for Windows, Mac, Linux
Antivirus provider Poll 2022
Message
<blockquote data-quote="kC77" data-source="post: 984085" data-attributes="member: 92796"><p>yep agree about the point in time etc & any of the big fails i tested over a period</p><p>sophos - retested with the same sample set for 2 weeks.... 6 different tests all same result - drive wiped vm unbootable</p><p>norton - 2 tests done with 21.x both failed, a week or so later noticed 22.2 was released, same test with same samples, same result protection quits mid-test.</p><p>eset av - 2 tests to confirm, failed (ransomwared), tested again a week later with same samples, same result - ransomed</p><p></p><p>as for defender i do multiple tests at least once or twice a week with the old & added fresh samples, the only 100% guaranteed pass is if defenderUI pro is used (which relies on the voodooshield magic for extra opinion)</p><p>in this case in my testing if ANY AV above was used along with voodooshield it would pass this .exe test 100% easily</p><p>**if voodooshield was used alone with no AV it would probably pass100% its a basic .exe test**</p><p></p><p>there are plenty of tougher tests out there and thnigs av do scripts/web protection etc which I havnt taken into account for these tests and therefore my results shouldne be used as a good/bad av... its just i wanted to find exactly what i wanted for my use case.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="kC77, post: 984085, member: 92796"] yep agree about the point in time etc & any of the big fails i tested over a period sophos - retested with the same sample set for 2 weeks.... 6 different tests all same result - drive wiped vm unbootable norton - 2 tests done with 21.x both failed, a week or so later noticed 22.2 was released, same test with same samples, same result protection quits mid-test. eset av - 2 tests to confirm, failed (ransomwared), tested again a week later with same samples, same result - ransomed as for defender i do multiple tests at least once or twice a week with the old & added fresh samples, the only 100% guaranteed pass is if defenderUI pro is used (which relies on the voodooshield magic for extra opinion) in this case in my testing if ANY AV above was used along with voodooshield it would pass this .exe test 100% easily **if voodooshield was used alone with no AV it would probably pass100% its a basic .exe test** there are plenty of tougher tests out there and thnigs av do scripts/web protection etc which I havnt taken into account for these tests and therefore my results shouldne be used as a good/bad av... its just i wanted to find exactly what i wanted for my use case. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Top