viktik

Level 24
131189 malware samples were collected on 17 feb 2015. test was done on 3rd march 2015

No malware were executed. Test result shows the malware that were detected on-access and not the on-demand detection.
 

jamescv7

Level 85
Verified
Trusted
At least Microsoft WD/MSE is not totally bad at their at least 13% missed samples ;) still it can protect for newer threats, meanwhile nothing really surprise on neck to neck accurate file detection and FP makes them their ratings to downfall at the end of result.

So still I wll go for MS for having zero FP, without any interruptions to my system. ;)
 

Maxxx58

Level 13
At least Microsoft WD/MSE is not totally bad at their at least 13% missed samples ;) still it can protect for newer threats, meanwhile nothing really surprise on neck to neck accurate file detection and FP makes them their ratings to downfall at the end of result.

So still I wll go for MS for having zero FP, without any interruptions to my system. ;)
It means you're using Windows Defender?
 

Janl92l

New Member
Still so much post about "give them money for nice rating",wow. i tought this would stop. av vendors all pay the same amount of money u can research it instead of give false post.by the way,nice avira,realy a keeper with great signatures and avast is still improving. No wonder avast got some realy nice and know ppls into there team over the last years. thats not all what avast will shown in the future.
 
Top