- Mar 2, 2016
- 151
So the 2016 Real World June test is here, What do you think of the results? Suprised by anything? Feel free to discuss!
Personally, I don't count "User Dependent" because most people don't know what to allow or what to block (or if there is some type of malware inside a safe file/installer ... see most PUPs infections), the False Positives are way to high, it's ridiculous.
Thats the "standard" AV-Comparitives has in place for this type of testing.@_CyberGhosT_ thanks for the information.
I have just one question.
Why a vendor needs more than 98% protection rate to get certified? 97% isn't good?
I don't get it.
@Zerion
Awesome share, also note worthy is the RTTL Certification Test
Only 3 failed Certification (Listed Below)
1> Nano Antivirus Pro
2> TGsoft VirIT eXplorer Lite
3> Webroot SecureAnywhere Antivirus <--
Very surprised Webroot failed certification, well slightly surprised to be honest.
Source:
AMTSO Real Time Threat List (RTTL) based certification test
Certification Test - AV-Comparatives
I understand that they have to be strict but in my opinion 95%-96% is a good score.Thats the "standard" AV-Comparitives has in place for this type of testing.
It does seem kind of strict, but it is to protect the consumer so it fits.
PeAcE